Weed control in pea with reduced rates of imazethapyr applied preemergence and postemergence

Weed Technology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 14-18

  Sikkema, Peter ^b   Deen, William ^b   Vyas, Sima ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Herbicide efficacy; Pea yields; Reduced herbicide rates

Indexed keywords

CROP YIELD; GRASS; HERBICIDE; LEGUME; WEED CONTROL;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; ONTARIO;

AMARANTHUS RETROFLEXUS; AMBROSIA; AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA; BRASSICA; CHENOPODIUM ALBUM; PISUM SATIVUM; SETARIA VIRIDIS;

EID: 33748062669     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-03-051R3     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Anonymous. 1994. AC 299 263 Experimental Herbicide. Princeton, NJ: American Cyanamid. 5 p.
2. Blackshaw, R. E. and J. T. O'Donovan. 1993. Higher crop seed rates can aid weed management. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. 3:1003-1008.
3. Brown, D. M. and A. Bootsma. 1993. Crop Heat Units for Corn and Other Warm Season Crops in Ontario. Toronto, ON: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, OMAF Factsheet (AGDEX 111/31). 4 p.
4. Buhler, D. D., J. L. Gunsolus, and D. F. Ralston. 1991. Influence of application time on weed control with reduced rates of imazethapyr and thifensulfuron in a weed nursery, 1991. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:264-265.
5. Hager, A. G. and K. A. Renner. 1994. Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) control in soybean (Glycine max) with bentazon as influenced by imazethapyr or thifensulfuron tank mixes. Weed Technol. 8:756-771.
6. Harvey, R. G. and J. W. Albright. 1990. Imazethapyr rate, timing additive and lupin variety weed control study. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:127-128.
7. Leuschen, W. E., J. L. Gunsolus, T. R. Hoverstad, and J. J. Getting. 1993. Postemergence herbicides for common cocklebur control in soybeans at Waseca, MN in 1993. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:248-249.
8. Malik, N. D., C. L. Darwent, and J. Moyen 1988. Weed control in forage legumes with imazethapyr. Forage Notes 32:42-45.
9. Shaner, D. L. 1989. Factor Affecting Soil and Foliar Bioactivity of Imidazolinones. Technical Information Rep. Princeton, NJ: Agricultural Research Division, American Cyanamid. 24 p.
10. Shaner, D. L., P. C. Anderson, and M. A. Stidham. 1984. Imidazolinones: potent inhibitors of acetohydroxylacid synthase. Plant Physiol. 76:544-546.
11. SPSS Inc. 1983. SPSS User's Guide. A Complete Guide to SPSS Language and Operations. Chicago, IL: SPSS-McGraw Hill. 575 p.
12. Vencill, W. K., H. P. Wilson, T. E. Hines, and K. K. Hatzios. 1988. Evaluation of imazethapyr in peas and snap beans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:200.
13. Wall, D. A., G. H. Friesen, and T. K. Bhati. 1991. Wild mustard interference in traditional and semi-leafless peas. Can J. Plant Sci. 71:473-480.
14. William, K., H. P. Vencill, E. Hines Thomas, and K. H. Kriton. 1990. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and rotational crop response to imazethapyr in pea (Pisum sativum) and snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 4:39-43.