Interrater reliability of the OPI: Using academic trainee raters

Foreign Language Annals

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 223-233

  Halleck, Gene B ^a,b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748060484     PISSN: 0015718X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb02329.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. 1986. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: ACTFL.
2. Adams, M. L 1978. "Measuring Foreign Language Speaking Proficiency: A Study of Agreement among Raters," 129-149 in J. L D. Clark, ed., Direct Testing of Speaking Proficiency: Theory and Application. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
3. Bachman, Lyle, and Adrian Palmer. 1981. "The Construct Validation of the FSI Oral Interview." Language Learning 31: 67-86.
4. _. 1983. "The Construct Validity of the FSI Oral Interview," 154-169, in J. W. Oller, Jr., ed., Issues in Language Testing Research. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
5. Barnwell, David. 1985. Reliability and Validity of Some Measures of Foreign Language Proficiency with Special Reference to the Oral Proficiency Interview. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
6. Bragger, Jeannette. 1985. "The Development of Oral Proficiency," 41-75, in Alice Omaggio, ed., Proficiency, Curriculum, Articulation: The Ties that Bind. Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.
7. Carroll, J. B. 1967. "Foreign Language Proficiency Levels Attained by Language Majors Near Graduation from College." Foreign Language Annals 1: 131-151.
8. Clark, J. L. D. 1972. Measurement Implications of Recent Trends in Foreign Language Testing," 219-257, in D. L Lange and D. J. James, eds., Foreign Language Education: A Reappraisal. The ACTFL Review of Foreign Language Education.
9. _. 1978. Direct Testing of Speaking Proficiency: Theory and Application. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
10. Clark, J. L. D., and R. Clifford. 1988. "The FSI/ ILR/ACTFL Proficiency Scales and Testing Techniques: Development, Current Status, and Needed Research." Studies in Second Language Acquisition 10: 129-147.
11. Halleck, Gene B. 1995. "Assessing Oral Proficiency: A Comparison of Holistic and Objective Measures." Modern Language Journal 79: 223-234.
12. Ke, Chuanren, and Daniel J. Reed. 1995. "An Analysis of Results from the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview and the Chinese Proficiency Test Before and After Intensive Instruction in Chinese as a Foreign Language." Foreign Language Annals 28: 208-222.
13. Liskin-Gasparro, Judith. 1983. "The ACTFL Professional Guidelines: A Historical Perspective," 11-42 in T. V. Higgs, ed., Teaching for Proficiency, the Organizing Principle. Vol. 14. The ACTFL Foreign Language Education Series. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
14. _. 1987. Testing and Teaching for Oral Proficiency. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
15. Magnan, Sally. 1987. "Rater Reliability of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview." The Canadian Modern Language Review 43: 267-279.
16. Shohamy, Elana. 1983a. "Interrater and Intrarater Reliability," 229-236 in J. W. Oller, Jr., ed., Issues in Language Testing Research. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
17. _. 1983b. "Rater Reliability of the Oral Interview Speaking Test." Foreign Language Annals 16: 219-222.