Transformer tests using MATLAB/Simulink and their integration into undergraduate electric machinery courses

Computer Applications in Engineering Education

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 142-150

  Ayasun, Saffet ^a   Nwankpa, Chika O ^b  

^a NIGDE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

Education; MATLAB Simulink; Software laboratory; Transformers

Indexed keywords

CIRCUIT PARAMETERS; ELECTRIC MACHINERY EDUCATION; MATLAB/SIMULINK; SOFTWARE LABORATORY;

CIRCUIT THEORY; EDUCATION COMPUTING; ELECTRIC MACHINERY; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENTS;

ELECTRIC TRANSFORMERS;

EID: 33748059857     PISSN: 10613773     EISSN: 10990542     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cae.20077     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. SIMULINK, Model-Based and System-Based Design, Using Simulink, MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, 2000.
2. SimPowerSystems for Use with Simulink, User's Guide, MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, 2002.
3. S. Linke, J. Torgeson, and J. Au, An interactive computer-graphics program to aid instruction in electric machinery, IEEE Comput Appl Power 2 (1989), 19-25.
4. H. A. Smolleck, Modeling and analysis of the induction machine: A computational/experimental approach, IEEE Trans Power Syst 5 (1990), 482-485.
5. M. H. Nehrir, F. Fatchi, and V. Gerez, Computer modeling for enhancing instruction of electric machinery, IEEE Trans Educ 38 (1995), 166-170.
6. K. A. Nigim and R. R. DeLyser, Using MathCad in understanding the induction motor characteristics, IEEE Trans Educ 44 (2001), 165-169.
7. W. M. Daniels and A. R. Shaffer, Re-inventing the electrical machines curriculum, IEEE Trans Educ 41 (1998), 92-100.
8. S. Ayasun and C. O. Nwankpa, Induction motor test using Matlab/Simulink and their integration into undergraduate electric machinery courses, IEEE Trans Educ 48 (2005), 37-46.
9. S. J. Chapman, Electric Machinery Fundamentals, 3rd ed., WCB/McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998.
10. M. S. Sarma. Electric machines: Steady-state theory and dynamic performance, 2nd ed., West, St. Paul, MN, 1994.
11. K. L. Shi, T. F. Chan, Y. K. Wong, and S. L. Ho, Modeling and simulation of the three-phase induction motor using Simulink, Int J Electr Eng Educ 36 (1999), 163-172.
12. A. Demiroren and H. L. Zeynelgil, Modeling and simulation of synchronous machine transient analysis using SIMULINK, Int J Electr Eng Educ 39 (2003), 337-346.
13. V. F. Pires and J. F. A. Silva, Teaching nonlinear modeling, simulation, and control of electronic power converters using Matlab/Simulink, IEEE Trans Educ 45 (2002), 253-261.
14. C. D. Vournas, E. G. Potamianakis, C. Moors, and T. V. Cutsem, An educational simulation tool for power system control and stability, IEEE Trans Power Syst 19 (2004), 48-55.
15. S. Muknahallipatna, S. Legowski, S. Ula, and J. Kopas, Power system transient stability analysis software tool for an undergraduate curriculum, Comput Appl Eng Educ 9 (2001), 37-48.
16. R. Patel, T. S. Bhatti, and D. P. Kolhari, MATLAB/ Simulink-based transient stability analysis of a multi-machine power system. Int J Electr Eng Educ 39 (2003), 320-336.
17. C. A. Canizares and Z. T. Faur, Advantages and disadvantages of using computer tools in electrical engineering courses, IEEE Trans Educ 40 (1997), 166-171.
18. C. Domnisoru, Using MATHCAD in teaching power engineering, IEEE Trans Educ 48 (2005), 157-161.
19. S. P. Carullo and C. O Nwankpa, Interconnected power system laboratory: A computer automated instructional facility for power system experiments, IEEE Trans Power Syst 17 (2002), 215-222.