Of two minds: Sceptic-proponent collaboration within parapsychology

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 313-322

  Schlitz, Marilyn ^a   Wiseman, Richard ^b   Watt, Caroline ^c   Radin, Dean ^a  

^a Institute of Noetic Sciences   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; COOPERATION; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARAPSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESEARCH;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AROUSAL; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; CULTURE; FEMALE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARAPSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH; TELEPATHY;

EID: 33748046820     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000712605X80704     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alcock, J. (2003). Give the null hypothesis a chance: Reasons to remain doubtful about the existence of Psi. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 29-50.
2. Bem, D. J., & Honorton, C. (1994). Does Psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 4-18.
3. Blackmore, S. (1989). What do we really think: A survey of parapsychologists and sceptics. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 55, 251-262.
4. Braud, W., Shafer, D., & Andrews, S. (1993a). Reactions to an unseen gaze (remote attention): A review, with new data on autonomic staring detection. Journal of Parapsychology, 57, 373-390.
5. Braud, W., Shafer, D., & Andrews, S. (1993b). Further studies of autonomic detection of remote staring: Replications, new control procedures, and personality correlates. Journal of Parapsychology, 57, 391-409.
6. Coover, J. E. (1913). The feeling of being stared at. American Journal of Psychology, 24, 570-575.
7. Edge, H. L., Morris, R. L., Palmer, J., & Rush, J. H. (1986). Foundations of parapsychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8. Honorton, C. (1985). Meta-analysis of psi ganzfeld research: A response to Hyman. Journal of Parapsychology, 49(1), 51-92.
9. Hyman, R. (1985). The ganzfeld psi experiment: A critical appraisal. Journal of Parapsychology, 49, 3-49.
10. Hyman, R. (1994). Anomaly or artifact? Comments on Bem and Honorton. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 19-24.
11. Hyman, R., & Honorton, C. (1986). A joint communiqué: The psi ganzfeld controversy. Journal of Parapsychology, 50, 350-364.
12. Milton, J., & Wiseman, R. (1999). Does Psi exist? Lack of replication of an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 387-391.
13. Palmer, J. (1986). ESP research findings: The process approach. In H. L. Edge, R. L. Morris, J. Palmer & J. H. Rush (Eds), Foundations of parapsychology (pp. 184-222). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
14. Palmer, J. (1989a). Confronting the experimenter effect. Parapsychology Review, 20(4), 1-4.
15. Palmer, J. (1989b). Confronting the experimenter effect. Part 2. Parapsychology Review, 20(5), 1-5.
16. Palmer, J. (1997). The challenge of experimenter Psi. European Journal of Parapsychology, 13, 110-125.
17. Peterson, D. M. (1978). Through the looking glass: An investigation of extra-sensory detection of being stared at. Masters thesis, University of Edinburgh.
18. Roe, C. A. (1999). Critical thinking and belief in the paranormal: A re-evaluation. British Journal of Psychology, 90(1), 85-98.
19. Schlitz, M. J. (2001). Boundless mind: Coming of age in parapsychology. Journal of Parapsychology, 65, 335-350.
20. Schlitz, M. J., & Honorton, C. (1992). Ganzfeld psi performance within an artistically gifted population. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 86, 83-98.
21. Schlitz, M. J., & LaBerge, S. (1994). Autonomic detection of remote observation: Two conceptual replications. In D. J. Bierman (Ed.), Proceedings of the Parapsychological Association 37th Annual Convention (pp. 352-360). Fairhaven, MA: Parapsychological Association.
22. Schmidt, S., Schneider, R., Utts, J., & Walach, H. (20004). Distant intentionality and the feeling of being stared at: Two meta-analyses. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 235-247.
23. Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2000), Electrodermal activity (EDA): State-of-the-art measurement and techniques for parapsychological purposes. Journal of Parapsychology, 64, 139-164.
24. Smith, M. D. (2003). The role of the experimenter in parapsychological research. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 69-84.
25. Titchener, E. B. (1898) The feeling of being stared at. Science, 8, 895-897.
26. Utts, J. (1991). Replication and meta-analysis in parapsychology. Statistical Science, 6(4), 363-403.
27. Watt, C., Schlitz, M., Wiseman, R., & Radin, D. (2005). Experimenter differences in a remote staring study. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association, 256-260.
28. Watt, C., Wiseman, R., & Schlitz, M. (2002). Tacit information in remote staring research: The Wiseman-Schlitz interviews. Paranormal Review, 24, 18-25.
29. Wiseman, R., & Greening, E. (2002). The mind machine: A mass participation experiment into the possible existence of extrasensory perception, British Journal of Psychology, 93, 487-499.
30. Wiseman, R., & Schlitz, M. (1997). Experimenter effects and the remote detection of staring. Journal of Parapsychology, 61, 197-207.
31. Wiseman, R., & Schlitz, M. (1999). Replication of experimenter effect and the remote detection of staring. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association, 471-479.
32. Wiseman, R., & Smith, M.D. (1994). A further look at the detection of unseen gaze. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association, 465-478.
33. Wiseman, R., Smith, MD., Freedman, D., Wasserman, T., & Hurst, C. (1995). Two further experiments concerning the remote detection of an unseen gaze. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Convention of the Parapsychological Association, 480-490.