Hierarchical patch dynamics and animal movement pattern

Oecologia

Volumn 149, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 383-395

  Fauchald, Per ^a   Tveraa, Torkild ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Area restricted search; First passage time; Hierarchical foraging; Random walk; Satellite telemetry

Indexed keywords

FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; PATCH DYNAMICS; SEABIRD; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BIRD; EUPHAUSIACEA; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION MIGRATION; PREDATION; TELEMETRY;

ANIMAL MIGRATION; ANIMALS; BIRDS; EUPHAUSIACEA; HOMING BEHAVIOR; MALE; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; TELEMETRY;

ANIMALIA; AVES; DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA); EUPHAUSIA SUPERBA; EUPHAUSIACEA; PROCELLARIIDAE; THALASSOICA ANTARCTICA;

EID: 33748037717     PISSN: 00298549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0463-7     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alerstam T, Gudmundson GA, Larsson B (1993) Flight tracks and speeds of Antarctic and Atlantic seabirds: radar and optical measurements. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 340:55-67
2. Comiso J (1999) Bootstrap sea ice concentrations from Nimbus-7 SMMR and DMSP SSM/I. National Snow and Ice Data Center. Digital media, Boulder, Colo.
3. Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York
4. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York
5. Farnsworth KD, Beecham JA (1999) How do grazers achieve their distribution? A continuum of models from random diffusion to the ideal free distribution using biased random walks. Am Nat 153:509-526
6. Fauchald P (1999) Foraging in a hierarchical patch system. Am Nat 153:603-613
7. Fauchald P, Erikstad KE, Skarsfjord H (2000) Scale-dependent predator-prey interactions: the hierarchical spatial distribution of seabirds and prey. Ecology 81:773-783
8. Fauchald P, Erikstad KE (2002) Scale-dependent predator-prey interactions: the aggregative response of seabirds to prey under variable prey abundance and patchiness. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 231:279-291
9. Fauchald P, Tveraa T (2003) Using first-passage time in the analysis of area-restricted search and habitat selection. Ecology 84:282-288
10. Fritz H, Said S, Weimerskirch H (2003) Scale-dependent hierarchical adjustments of movement patterns in a long-range foraging seabird. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 270:1143-1148
11. Grünbaum D (1998) Using spatially explicit models to characterize foraging performance in heterogeneous landscapes. Am Nat 151:97-115
12. Haury LR, McGowan JA, Wiebe PH (1978) Patterns and processes in the time-space scales of plankton distributions. In: Steele JH (ed) Spatial pattern in plankton communities. Plenum Press, New York
13. Hofmann EE, Murphy EJ (2004) Advection, krill, and Antarctic marine ecosystems. Antarct Sci 16:487-499
14. Hunt GL Jr, Schneider DC (1987) Scale-dependent processes in the physical and biological environment of marine birds. In: Croxall JP (ed) Seabirds: feeding biology and role in marine ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
15. Kareiva P, Odell G (1987) Swarms of predators exhibit preytaxis if individual predators use area-restricted search. Am Nat 130:233-270
16. Kareiva PM, Shigesada N (1983) Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random-walk. Oecologia 56:234-238
17. Kirkerud B (1989) Object-oriented programming with Simula. International computer science series. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham
18. Kotliar NB, Wiens JA (1990) Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59:253-260
19. Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943-1967
20. Levin SA (2000) Multiple scales and the maintenance of biodiversity. Ecosystems 3:498-506
21. Lorentsen SH, Klages N, Røv N (1998) Diet and prey consumption of Antarctic petrels Thalassoica antarctica at Svarthamaren, Dronning Maud Land, and at sea outside the colony. Polar Biol 19:414-420
22. Mann KH, Lazier JRN (1991) Dynamics of marine ecosystems: biological-physical interactions in the oceans. Blackwell, Boston, Mass.
23. Miller DGM, Hampton I (1989a) Biology and ecology of the Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana): a review. Biomass Sci Ser 9:1-166
24. Miller DGM, Hampton I (1989b) Krill aggregation characteristics - spatial distribution patterns from hydroacoustic observations. Polar Biol 10:125-134
25. Murphy EJ, Morris DJ, Watkins JL, Priddle J (1988) Scales of interactions between Antarctic krill and the environment. In: Sharhage D (ed) Antarctic Ocean and resources variability. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
26. Murphy EJ, et al. (1998) Interannual variability of the South Georgia marine ecosystem: biological and physical sources of variation in the abundance of krill. Fish Oceanogr 7:381-390
27. O'Neill RV, DeAngelis DL, Waide JB, Allen TFH (1986) A Hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
28. Orsi AH, Nowlin WD, Whitworth T (1993) On the circulation and stratification of the Weddell Gyre. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap 40:169-203
29. Pinaud D, Weimerskirch H (2005) Scale-dependent habitat use in a long-ranging central place predator. J Anim Ecol 74:852-863
30. Senft RL, Coughenour MB, Bailey DW, Rittenhouse LR, Sala OE, Swift DM (1987) Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchies. Bioscience 37:789-799
31. Siegel V (2000) Krill (Euphausiacea) demography and variability in abundance and distribution. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:151-167
32. Stommel H (1963) Varieties of oceanographic experience. Science 139:572-576
33. Veit RR (1999) Behavioural responses by foraging petrels to swarms of Antarctic krill Euphausia superba. Ardea 87:41-50
34. Viswanathan GM, Afanasyev V, Buldyrev SV, Murphy EJ, Prince PA, Stanley HE (1996) Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses. Nature 381:413-415
35. Viswanathan GM, Buldyrev SV, Havlin S, da Luz MGE, Raposo EP, Stanley HE (1999) Optimizing the success of random searches. Nature 401:911-914
36. Weimerskirch H (1998) How can a pelagic seabird provision its chick when relying on a distant food resource? Cyclic attendance at the colony, foraging decision and body condition in sooty shearwaters. J Anim Ecol 67:99-109
37. Weimerskirch H, Salamonard M, Sarrazin F, Jouventin P (1993) Foraging strategy of wandering albatrosses through the breeding season: a study using satellite telemetry. Auk 110:325-342
38. Weimerskirch H, Doncaster CP, Cuenotchaillet F (1994) Pelagic seabirds and the marine environment: foraging patterns of wandering albatrosses in relation to prey availability and distribution. Proc R Soc Lond Biol Sci 255:91-97
39. Weimerskirch H, Cherel Y, Cuenot Chaillet F, Ridoux V (1997) Alternative foraging strategies and resource allocation by male and female wandering albatrosses. Ecology 78:2051-2063
40. Weimerskirch H, Ancel A, Caloin M, Zahariev A, Spagiari J, Kersten M, Chastel O (2003) Foraging efficiency and adjustment of energy expenditure in a pelagic seabird provisioning its chick. J Anim Ecol 72:500-508
41. Weimerskirch H, Gault A, Cherel Y (2005) Prey distribution and patchiness: factors in foraging success and efficiency of wandering albatrosses. Ecology 86:2611-2622
42. Wiens JA (1976) Population responses to patchy environments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 7:81-120
43. Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3:385-397
44. Wu J, Loucks OL (1995) From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q Rev Biol 70:439-466
45. Zollner PA, Lima SL (1999) Search strategies for landscape-level interpatch movements. Ecology 80:1019-1030