Benchmarks affect perceptions of prior disability in a structured interview

Journal of Business and Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 489-500

  Reilly, Nora P ^a   Bocketti, Shawn P ^a   Maser, Stephen A ^a   Wennet, Craig L ^a  

^a RADFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ADA; Benchmarks; Cancer; Depression; Disability; Situational interview; Stigma; Structured interview; Structured ratings; Substance abuse

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747887071     PISSN: 08893268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-005-9005-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) (1991). 42 § U.S.C. 12101-12111.
2. Adams, J. E. (1991). Judicial and regulatory interpretation of the employment rights of persons with disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 22, 28-46.
3. Baily, J. W. (1991). Evaluation of a task partner who does or does not have a physical disability: Response amplification or sympathy effect? Rehabilitation Psychology, 36, 99-110.
4. Bordieri, J. E. & Drehmer, D. E. (1986), Hiring decisions for disabled workers: Looking at the cause. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 197-208.
5. Cesare, V., Varvel, T. B., (1994). The impact of applicant disability and level of qualification on interviewer decision-making. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN.
6. Crocker, J. & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
7. Czajka, J. M. & DeNisi, A. S. (1988). Effects of emotional disability and clear performance standards on performance ratings. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 394-404.
8. Florian, V. (1978). Employers' opinions of the disabled person as a worker. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 22, 38-43.
9. Gousie, L. J. (1992). Interview structure and interviewer prejudice as factors in the evaluations and selection of minority and non-minority applicants. Applied HRM Research, 4, 1-13.
10. Hebl, M. R. & Kleck, R. E. (2002). Acknowledging one's stigma in the interview setting: Effective strategy or liability?. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(2), 223-249.
11. Janz, T., Hellervik, L., & Gilmore, D. C. (1986), Behavior Description Interviewing. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Kaplan, H. I. & Sadock, B. J. (1998). Synopsis of Psychiatry, 8th edition, Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
13. Latham, G. P., Saari, L. M., Purcell, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (1980). The situational interview, Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422-427.
14. Nemeroff, C. B., (1998), The neurobiology of depression. Scientific American, At http:// - sciam.com:80/1998/0698issue/0698nemeroff.html.
15. Rabasca, L. (1999). Improving life for survivors of cancer. The APA Monitor, 30(6), 28-29.
16. Reilly, N. P., Wennet, C., Murphy, M., Thierauf, M., Gaugler, G., & Godfrey, K. J. (1998). Teaching evaluations of persons with disabilities differ according to the nature of the disability. Journal of Rehabilitation, 64(1), 38-41.
17. Stone, C. I. & Sawatzki, B. (1980), Hiring bias and the disabled interviewee: Effects of manipulating work history and disability information of the disabled job applicant. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 96-104.
18. Tagalakis, V., Amsel, R., & Fichten, C. S. (1988), Job interview strategies for people with a visible disability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 520-532.
19. Wiesner, W. H. & Cronshaw, S. F. (1988). A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 275-290.
20. Wright, P. M., Lichtenfels, P. A., & Purcell, E. D. (1989). The structured interview: Additional studies and meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 191-199.