Bladder Augmentation With Acellular Dermal Biomatrix in a Diseased Animal Model

Journal of Urology

Volumn 176, Issue 4 SUPPL., 2006, Pages 1706-1711

  Akbal, Cem ^a   Lee, Sang Don ^a   Packer, Subah C ^a   Davis, Marry M ^a   Rink, Richard C ^a   Kaefer, Martin ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

biomatrix preparations; bladder; swine

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; EOSIN; HEMATOXYLIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLADDER COMPLIANCE; BLADDER CONTRACTION; BLADDER INJURY; BLADDER OBSTRUCTION; BLADDER WALL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTOSTOMY; CYSTOSTOMY CATHETER; DERMIS; DEVICE; GRAFT FAILURE; HISTOLOGY; HYPERTROPHY; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTILITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEPSIS; STAINING; SWINE; TISSUE REGENERATION; URETHRA OBSTRUCTION; URODYNAMICS;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; COLLAGEN; FEMALE; MALE; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; REGENERATION; SWINE; URINARY BLADDER; URINARY BLADDER NECK OBSTRUCTION; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 33747885564     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.04.085     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Atala A. New methods of bladder augmentation. BJU Int 85 (2000) 24
2. Greenwell T.I., Venn S.N., and Mundy A.R. Augmentation cystoplasty. BJU Int 88 (2001) 511
3. Rink R.C. Bladder augmentation. options, outcome, future. Urol Clin North Am 26 (1999) 111
4. Shekarriz B., Upadhyay J., Demirbilek S., Barthold J.S., and Gonzalez R. Surgical complications of bladder augmentation. comparison between various enterocystoplasties in 133 patients. Urology 55 (2000) 123
5. Melchior D., Johnson T.-C., Packer C.-S., and Kaefer M. Bladder augmentation using acellular dermis in an allogeneic model (2003) Presented at meeting of European Society of Pediatric Urology, Madrid, Spain
6. McDougal W.S. Metabolic complications of urinary intestinal diversion. J Urol 147 (1992) 1199
7. Filmer R.B., and Spencer J.R. Malignancies in bladder augmentations and intestinal conduits. J Urol 143 (1990) 671
8. Duel B.P., Gonzalez R., and Barthold J.S. Alternative techniques for augmentation cystoplasty. J Urol 159 (1998) 998
9. Gleeson M.J., and Griffith D.P. The use of alloplastic biomaterials in bladder substitution. J Urol 148 (1992) 1377
10. Vaught J.D., Kropp B.P., Sawyer B.D., Rippy M.K., Badylak S.F., Shannon H.E., et al. Detrusor regeneration in the rat using porcine intestinal submucosal grafts. functional. innervation and receptor expression. J Urol 155 (1996) 374
11. Brown A.L., Farhat W., Merguerian P.A., Wilson G.J., Khoury A.E., and Woodhouse K.A. 22 week assessment of bladder acellular matrix as a bladder augmentation material in a porcine model. Biomaterials 23 (2002) 2179
12. Atala A. Tissue engineering for the replacement of organ function in the genitourinary system. Am J Transplant 4 suppl (2004) 58
13. Piechota H.J., Dahms S.E., Nunes L.S., Dahiya R., Lue T.F., and Tanagho E.A. In vitro functional properties of the rat bladder regenerated by the bladder acellular matrix graft. J Urol 159 (1998) 1717
14. Landman J., Olweny E., Sundaram C.P., Andreoni C., Collyer W.C., Rehman J., et al. Laparoscopic mid sagittal hemicystectomy and bladder reconstruction with small intestinal submucosa and reimplantation of ureter into small intestinal submucosa. 1-year followup. J Urol 171 (2004) 2450
15. Backhaus B.O., Kaefer M., Haberstroh K.M., Hile K., Nagatomi J., Rink R.C., et al. Alterations in the molecular determinants of bladder compliance at hydrostatic pressures less than 40 cm. H2O. J Urol 168 (2002) 2600
16. Haberstroh K.M., Kaefer M., DePaola N., Frommer S.A., and Bizios R. A novel in-vitro system for the simultaneous exposure of bladder smooth muscle cells to mechanical strain and sustained hydrostatic pressure. J Biomech Eng 124 (2002) 208
17. Haberstroh K.M., Kaefer M., Retik A.B., Freeman M.R., and Bizios R. The effects of sustained hydrostatic pressure on select bladder smooth muscle cell functions. J Urol 162 (1999) 2114