The distribution of and factors associated with intimate terrorism and situational couple violence among a population-based sample of urban women in the United States

Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1286-1313

  Frye, Victoria ^a   Manganello, Jennifer ^b   Campbell, Jacquelyn C ^c   Walton Moss, Benita ^c   Wilt, Susan ^d  

^a NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE   (United States)

Author keywords

Control; Domestic violence; Gender; Women

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BATTERED WOMAN; BEHAVIOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MIDDLE AGED; PARTNER VIOLENCE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; URBAN POPULATION; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BATTERED WOMEN; COERCION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MIDDLE AGED; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; SAMPLING STUDIES; SPOUSE ABUSE; UNITED STATES; URBAN POPULATION; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 33747882083     PISSN: 08862605     EISSN: 15526518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0886260506291658     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in physical aggression to partners: A reply to Frieze (2000), O'Leary (2000), and White, Smith, Koss, and Figueredo. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 697-702.
2. Bible, A., Dasgupta, S. D., & Osthoff, S. (2002). Guest editors' introduction. Violence Against Women, 8, 1267-1270.
3. Campbell, J. C., Sharps, P. W., & Glass, N. E. (1999). Risk of intimate partner homicide. In L. Pagani (Ed.), Clinical assessment of dangerousness: Empirical contributions (pp. 136-157). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C. R., Campbell, D. W., Curry, M. A., et al. (2002). Risk factors for femicide in abusive relationships: Results from a multi-site case control study. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1089-1097.
5. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. C. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
6. Dobash, R. P., & Dobash, R. E. (2004). Women's violence to men in intimate relationships: Working on a puzzle. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 324-349.
7. Falik, M. K., & Collins, K. S. (Eds.). (1996). Women's health: The Commonwealth Fund Survey. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Feld, S. L., & Straus, M. A. (1989). Escalation and desistance of wife assault in marriage. Criminology, 27 (1). 141-161.
9. Frieze, I. H. (2000). Violence in close relationships - Development of a research area: Comment on Archer. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 681-684.
10. Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2003). Intimate terrorism and common couple violence - A test of Johnson's predictions in four British samples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 1247-1270.
11. Heise, L., Ellsberg, M., & Gottemoeller, M. (1999). Ending violence against women. Population Reports. Series L: Issues in World Health, 11, 1-43.
12. Hotaling, G. T., & Sugarman, D. B. (1990). A risk marker analysis of assaulted wives. Journal of Family Violence, 5, 1-13.
13. Johnson, H. (1996). Dangerous domains: Violence against women in Canada. Toronto: Nelson Canada.
14. Johnson, H., & Sacco, V. F. (1995). Researching violence against women: Statistics Canada's national survey. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 37, 281-304.
15. Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women in U.S. families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283-294.
16. Johnson, M. P. (1999, November). Two types of violence against women in the American family: Identifying patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the National Council on Family Relations, Irvine, CA.
17. Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948-963.
18. Johnson, M. P., & Leone, J. M. (2005). The differential effects of intimate terrorism and situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues.
19. Leone, J. M., Johnson, M. P., Cohan, C. M., & Lloyd, S. (2004). Consequences of male partner violence for low-income minority women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 471-489.
20. O'Leary, K. D. (2000). Are women really more aggressive than men in intimate relationships? Comment on Archer. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 685-689.
21. Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer.
22. Riggs, D. S., O'Leary, K. D., & Breslin, F. C. (1990). Multiple predictor of physical aggression in dating couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 61-73.
23. Straus, M. A. (1990). The Conflict Tactics Scales and its critics: An evaluation and new data on validity and reliability. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families (pp. 133-148). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
24. Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (Eds.). (1990). Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
25. Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4 (3). 159-177.
26. Waltermaurer, E. M., Ortega, C. A., & McNutt, L.-A. (2003). Issues in estimating the prevalence of intimate partner violence: Assessing the impact of abuse status on participation bias. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 959-974.