Repetitive, Duplicate, and Redundant Publications: A Review for Authors and Readers

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 505-509

  Johnson, Claire ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POLICY; PUBLICATION; SCIENCE;

AUTHORSHIP; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DUPLICATE PUBLICATION; HUMANS; PUBLICATIONS; RETRACTION OF PUBLICATION;

EID: 33747880910     PISSN: 01614754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.07.001     Document Type: Editorial

References (22)

1. Huth E. Repetitive and divided publication. In: Jones A., and McLellan F. (Eds). Ethical issues in biomedical publication (2000), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 112-136
2. Toy J. The Ingelfinger rule: Franz Ingelfinger at the New England Journal of Medicine, 1967-77. Science Editor 25 (2002) 195-198
3. Germenis A. Beyond the Ingelfinger rule: the intellectual property ethics after the end of biomedical journals' monopoly. Med Inform Internet Med 24 (1999) 165-170
4. Jacobson M. Biomedical publishing and the internet: evolution or revolution?. J Am Med Inform Assoc 7 (2000) 230-233
5. World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). WAME recommendations on publication ethics policies for medical journals: originality, prior publication, and media relations. [monograph on the Internet] (2005), WAME, London. http://www.wame.org/pubethicrecom.htm#orig [[cited 2006 Jul 4]. Available from: http://www.wame.org/pubethicrecom.htm#orig]
6. Elstein A., Cadmus C., Pitkin R., Mundy D., and McDowell C. Salami science: are we still allowing it?. Science Editor 21 (1998) 200
7. International Council of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication. IIID overlapping publications [monograph on the internet] (2006), ICMJE, Philadelphia. http://www.icmje.org/#over [[cited 2006 Jul 4]. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/#over]
8. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication practice. [monograph on the Internet] (2003), COPE, London. http://www.publicationethics.org.uk/guidelines [[cited 2006 Jul 4]. Available from: http://www.publicationethics.org.uk/guidelines]
9. Benos D., Fabres J., Farmer J., et al. Ethics and scientific publication. Adv Physiol Educ 29 (2005) 59-74
10. Tobin M. AJRCCM's policy on duplicate publication: infrequently asked questions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166 (2002) 433-434
11. Schein M., and Paladugu R. Redundant surgical publications: tip of the iceberg?. Surgery 129 (2001) 655-661
12. Rivara F., Christakis D., and Cummings P. Duplicate publication. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158 (2004) 926
13. Kassirer J., and Angell M. Redundant publication: a reminder. N Engl J Med 333 (1995) 449-450
14. Rogers L. Salami slicing, shotgunning, and the ethics of authorship. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173 (1999) 265
15. Iverson C., Flanagin A., Fontanarosa P., et al. American Medical Association manual of style: a guide for authors and editors. 9th ed. (1998), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 98-100
16. Bailey B. Duplicate publication in the field of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126 (2002) 211-216
17. von Elm E., Poglia G., Walder B., and Tramer M. Different patterns of duplicate publication: an analysis of articles used in systematic reviews. JAMA 291 (2004) 974-980
18. Reeves D., Wise R., and Drummond C. Duplicate publication: a cautionary tale. J Antimicrob Chemother 53 (2004) 411-412
19. Tramer M., Reynolds D., Moore R., and McQuay H. Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study. BMJ 315 (1997) 635-640
20. Yank V., and Barnes D. Consensus and contention regarding redundant publications in clinical research: cross-sectional survey of editors and authors. J Med Ethics 29 (2003) 109-114
21. Council of Science Editors. Editorial policy statements. [monograph on the internet] (2006), Council of Science Editors, Reston (Va). http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/services/cse_editorial_policies.cfm [[cited 2006 Jul 4]. Available from: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/services/cse_editorial_policies.cfm]
22. Office of Research Integrity. Managing allegations of scientific misconduct: a guidance document for editors (2006), Office of Research Integrity, Office of Public Health and Science, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville (Md). http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/masm_2000.pdf. [Available from: http://ori.dhhs.gov/documents/masm_2000.pdf]