How accurately can we control the FDR in analyzing microarray data?

Bioinformatics

Volumn 22, Issue 14, 2006, Pages 1730-1736

  Jung, Sin Ho ^a   Jang, Woncheol ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ACUTE GRANULOCYTIC LEUKEMIA; ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA; ANALYTICAL ERROR; CALCULATION; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; EFFECT SIZE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 33747877325     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl161     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Anderson,P.K. and Gill,R.D. (1982) Cox's regression model for counting processes: A large sample study. Ann. Stat., 10, 1100-1120.
2. Beer,D.G. et al. (2002) Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Nat. Med., 8, 816-824.
3. Benjamini,Y. and Hochberg,Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 57, 289-300.
4. Benjamini,Y. and Yekutieli,D. (2001) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Stat., 29, 1165-1188.
5. Cox,D.R. (1972) Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 34, 187-220.
6. Gentleman,R.C. et al. (2004) Bioconductor: Open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol., 5, R80.
7. Golub,T.R. et al. (1999) Molecular classification of cancer: Class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science, 286, 531-537.
8. Huang,Y., Xu,H., Calian,V. and Hsu,J.C. (2005) To permute or not permute. Technical Report 756, Department of Statistics, Ohio State University, OH.
9. Jung,S.-H. (2005) Sample size for FDR-control in microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics, 21, 3097-3104.
10. Jung,S.-H. et al. (2005) Amultiple testing procedure to associate gene expression levels with survival. Stat. Med., 21, 3097-3104.
11. Lehmann,E.L. and Romano,J.P. (2005) Generalizations of the familywise error rate. Ann. Stat., 33, 1138-1154.
12. Lin,D.Y. (2005) An efficient Monte Carlo approach to assessing statistical significance in genomic studies. Bioinformatics, 21, 781-787.
13. Lin,D.Y. and Wei,L.J. (1989) The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 84, 1074-1078.
14. Press,W.H., Flannery,B.P., Teukolsky,S.A. and Vetterling,W.T. (1980) Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, NY.
15. Storey,J.D. (2002) A direct approach to false discovery rates under dependence. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 64, 479-498.
16. Storey,J.D. (2003) The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Ann. Stat., 31, 2013-2035.
17. Storey,J.D. et al. (2004) Strong control, conservative point estimation, and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: A unified approach. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 66, 187-205.
18. Storey,J.D. and Tibshirani,R. (2001) Estimating false discovery rates under dependence, with applications to DNA microarrays. Technical Report 2001-28, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, CA.
19. Tusher,V. et al. (2001) Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 5116-5121.
20. van der Laan,M.J. et al. (2004) Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives. Stat. Appl. Gene. Mol. Biol., 3, 15.
21. Westfall,P.H. and Young,S.S. (1993) Resampling-based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for P-value Adjustment. Wiley, NY.