Preventing parolees from returning to prison through community-based reintegration

Crime and Delinquency

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 551-571

  Zhang, Sheldon X ^a   Roberts, Robert E L ^b   Callanan, Valerie J ^c  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community based corrections; Correctional services; Evaluation research; Parole reentry

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747875277     PISSN: 00111287     EISSN: 1552387X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011128705282594     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28 (3). 369-404.
2. Austin, J. (2001). Prisoner reentry: Current trends, practices, and issues. Crime & Delinquency, 47 (3). 314-334.
3. Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2001). From nothing works to what works: Changing professional ideology in the 21st century. The Prison Journal, 81 (3). 313-339.
4. Farabee, D., Prendergast, M., & Anglin, D. M. (1998). The effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation, 62 (1). 3-11.
5. Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works? Criminology, 34, 575-607.
6. Latessa, E. J., Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2002). Beyond correctional quackery - Professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment. Federal Probation, 62 (2). 43-49.
7. Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartman, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, et al. (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation (pp. 83-127). New York: Russell Sage.
8. Lipsey, M. W. (1995). What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents? In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works? Reducing reoffending: Guidelines from research and practice (pp. 63-78). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
9. Lipsey, M. W., & Cordray, D. S. (2000). Evaluation methods for social intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 345-375.
10. Lipton, D., Martinson, R., & Wilks, J. (1975). The effectiveness of correctional treatment: A survey of treatment evaluation studies. New York: Praeger.
11. Little Hoover Commission. (2003). Back to the community: Safe and sound parole policies. Sacramento, CA: Author. Available at www.lhc.ca.gov/lhcdir/172/ report172.pdf
12. Maltz, M. D. (1984). Recidivism. New York: Academic Press.
13. Martin, C., Lurigio, A. J., & Olson, D. E. (2003). An examination of rearrests and reincarcerations among discharged day reporting center clients. Federal Probation, 67 (1). 24-31.
14. Martinson, R. (1974). What works? - Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 35, 22-54.
15. McDonald, D. C. (1989). Punishment without walls: Community service sentences in New York City. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
16. Miller, N. S., & Flaherty, J. A. (2000). Effectiveness of coerced addiction treatment (alternative consequences): A review of clinical research. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18, 9-16.
17. Palmer, T., & Petrosino, A. (2003). The "experimenting agency." Evaluation Review, 27 (3). 228-266.
18. Petersilia, J. (2001). Prisoner reentry: Public safety and reintegration challenges. The Prison Journal, 81 (3). 360-375.
19. Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home - Parole and prisoner reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Polcin, D., & Greenfield, T. (2003). Factors associated with probation officers' use of criminal justice coercionto mandatealcoholtreatment. AmericanJournalof DrugandAlcoholAbuse, 29 (3). 647-671.
21. Schmidt, P., & Witte, A. D. (1988). Predicting recidivism using survival models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
22. Seiter, R. P., & Kadela, K. P. (2003). Prisoner reentry: What works, what does not, and what is promising. Crime & Delinquency, 49 (3). 360-388.
23. Sherman, L. W. (2000). Reducing incarceration rates: The promise of experimental criminology. Crime & Delinquency, 46 (3). 299-314.
24. Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. D. (1997). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
25. Tonry, M. (1997). Intermediate sanctions in sentencing guidelines. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
26. Weisburd, D. (2003). Ethical practice and evaluation of interventions in crime and justice: The moral imperative for randomized trials. Evaluation Review, 27 (3). 336-354.
27. Zimring, F., & Hawkins, G. (1995). Incapacitation:Penal confinementandthe restraint of crime. New York: Oxford University Press.