Comparative assessment of the antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine mastitis in biofilm versus planktonic culture

Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B: Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health

Volumn 53, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 326-332

  Melchior, M B ^a   Fink Gremmels, J ^a   Gaastra, W ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COUNT; BIOFILM; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS INFECTION;

ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BIOFILMS; CATTLE; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG RESISTANCE, BACTERIAL; FEMALE; MASTITIS, BOVINE; MICROBIAL SENSITIVITY TESTS; STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

ANIMALIA; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BOS TAURUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 33747867230     PISSN: 09311793     EISSN: 14390450     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.00962.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amorena, B., E. Gracia, M. Monzon, J. Leiva, C. Oteiza, M. Perez, J.L. Alabart, and J. Hernandez-Yago, 1999: Antibiotic susceptibility assay for Staphylococcus aureus in biofilms developed in vitro. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 44, 43-55.
2. Beenken, K. E., P. M. Dunman, F. McAleese, D. Macapagal, E. Murphy, S. J. Projan, J. S. Blevins, and M. S. Smeltzer, 2004: Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 186, 4665-4684.
3. Ceri, H., M. E. Olson, C. Stremick, R. R. Read, D. Morck, and A. Buret, 1999: The Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 1771-1776.
4. Christensen, G. D., L. M. Baddour, and W. A. Simpson, 1987: Phenotypic variation of Staphylococcus epidermidis slime production in vitro and in vivo. Infect. Immun. 55, 2870-2877.
5. Christensen, G. D., L. M. Baddour, B. M. Madison, J. T. Parisi, S. N. Abraham, D. L. Hasty, J. H. Lowrance, J. A. Josephs, and W. A. Simpson, 1990: Colonial morphology of staphylococci on Memphis agar: phase variation of slime production, resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, and virulence. J. Infect. Dis. 161, 1153-1169.
6. Costerton, J. W., P. S. Stewart, and E. P. Greenberg, 1999: Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284, 1318-1322.
7. Cramton, S. E., C. Gerke, N. F. Schnell, W. W. Nichols, and F. Gotz, 1999: The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect. Immun. 67, 5427-5433.
8. Dunne, W. M. Jr, 2002: Bacterial adhesion: seen any good biofilms lately? Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15, 155-166.
9. Fux, C. A., S. Wilson, and P. Stoodley, 2004: Detachment characteristics and oxacillin resistance of Staphyloccocus aureus biofilm emboli in an in vitro catheter infection model. J. Bacteriol. 186, 4486-4491.
10. Hensen, S. M., 2000a: Role of capsular polysaccharides and slime of Staphylococcus aureus in the pathogenesis. In: Bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis, bacterial adhesion and invasion in relation to pathogenisis and antimicrobial sensitivity. Thesis, University of Utrecht, Utrecht.
11. Hensen, S. M., M. J. Pavicic, J. A. Lohuis, and B. Poutrel, 2000: Use of bovine primary mammary epithelial cells for the comparison of adherence and invasion ability of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 418-429.
12. McKenney, D., J. Hubner, E. Muller, Y. Wang, D. A. Goldmann, and G. B. Pier, 1998: The ica locus of Staphylococcus epidermidis encodes production of the capsular polysaccharide/adhesin. Infect. Immun. 66, 4711-4720.
13. NCCLS, 2002: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals. NCCLS document M31-A2 (ISBN 1-56238-000-0). NCCLS, Pennyslvania, USA.
14. Olson, M. E., H. Ceri, D. W. Morck, A. G. Buret, and R. R. Read, 2002: Biofilm bacteria: formation and comparative susceptibility to antibiotics. Can. J. Vet. Res. 66, 86-92.
15. Prasad, L. B., and F. H. Newbould, 1968: Initial response of the bovine mammary gland to invasion by Staphylococcus aureus. Can. Vet. J. 9, 170-177.
16. Pratt, L. A., and R. Kolter, 1999: Genetic analyses of bacterial biofilm formation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2, 598-603.
17. Pyorala, S. H., and E. O. Pyorala, 1998: Efficacy of parenteral administration of three antimicrobial agents in treatment of clinical mastitis in lactating cows: 487 cases (1989-1995). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 212, 407-412.
18. Sol, J., O. C. Sampimon, J. J. Snoep, and Y. H. Schukken, 1997: Factors associated with bacteriological cure during lactation after therapy for subclinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 2803-2808.
19. Sol, J., O. C. Sampimon, H. W. Barkema, and Y. H. Schukken, 2000: Factors associated with cure after therapy of clinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus. J. Dairy Sci. 83, 278-284.
20. Taponen, S., A. Jantunen, E. Pyorala, and S. Pyorala, 2003: Efficacy of targeted 5-day combined parenteral and intramammary treatment of clinical mastitis caused by penicillin-susceptible or penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Acta Vet. Scand. 44, 53-62.
21. Vasudevan, P., M. K. Nair, T. Annamalai, and K. S. Venkitanarayanan, 2003: Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of bovine mastitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus for biofilm formation. Vet. Microbiol. 92, 179-185.
22. Vuong, C., and M. Otto, 2002: Staphylococcus epidermidis infections. Microbes Infect. 4, 481-489.
23. Wilson, D. J., R. N. Gonzalez, K. L. Case, L. L. Garrison, and Y. T. Grohn, 1999: Comparison of seven antibiotic treatments with no treatment for bacteriological efficacy against bovine mastitis pathogens. J. Dairy Sci. 82, 1664-1670.