The Price Weapon: Developments in U.S. Predatory Pricing Law

Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 3-22

  Helgeson, James G ^a   Gorger, Eric G ^a  

^a GONZAGA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Predatory pricing; Pricing; U.S. price law

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747824328     PISSN: 1051712X     EISSN: 15470628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J033v10n02_02     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. A. A. Poultry Farms v. Rose Acre Farms (1990), 881 F.2d 1396, 1402, 7th Cir., 1989, cert, denied, 494 U.S. 1019.
2. American Bar Association (1997), Antitrust Law Developments, 4th Edition, Chapter II, –Monopolization and Related Offences,— Chicago, 252.
3. Areeda, Phillip and Donald Turner (1975), –Predatory Pricing and Related Practices Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act,— Harvard Law Review, 88, 697.
4. Bathke v. Casey's General Stores, Inc. (1995), 64 F.3d 340 8th Cir.
5. Baumol, William (1996), –Predation and the Logic of the Average Variable Cost Test,— Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 39 (April) 49.
6. Bradley, Joseph and George Hay (1981), –Predatory Pricing: Competing Economic Theories and the Evolution of Legal Standards,— Cornell Law Review, 66, 740.
7. Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown and Williams Tobacco Corp. (1993), 509 U.S. 209.
8. California Computer Products v. International Business Machine Corp. (1979), 613 F.2d 727.
9. Cargill, Inc. et al. v. Monfort of Colorado (1979), 107 S. Ct. 484.
10. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Service (1992), 112 S. Ct. 2072.
11. Easterbrook, Frank H. (1981), –Predatory Strategies and Counterstrategies,— University of Chicago Law Review48, 263.
12. Fall City Ind., Inc. v. Vanco Beverage Inc. (1983), 103 S. Ct. 1282.
13. Gerla, Harry (1985), –The Psychology of Predatory Pricing: Why Predatory Pricing Pays,— Southwestern Law Journal 39 (3), 755.
14. Glazer, Kenneth L. (1994), –Predatory Pricing and Beyond: Life After Brooke Group,— Antitrust Law Journal, 62, 605.
15. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. Inc. v. FTC (1979), 440 US 69.
16. Guiltinan, Joseph P. and Gregory T. Gundlach (1996), –Aggressive and Predatory Pricing: A Framework for Analysis,— Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60 (July), 87.
17. Gundlach, Gregory T. and Joseph P. Guiltinan (1998), –A Marketing Perspective on Predatory Pricing,— Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 43 (Fall/Winter), 883.
18. Hallmark Industries v. Reynolds Metal Co. (1974), 489 F.2d 8.
19. Hansen, Hugh (1983), –Robinson-Patman Law: A Review and Analysis,— Fordham Law Review. 50, 1114.
20. Hanson v. Shell Oil Co. (1976). 541 F.2d 1352.
21. Hawker, Norman W. (1999), –Predatory Pricing Law in the United States and Canada,— University of Miami Business Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 2 (Spring), 201.
22. Henry v. Chloride Inc. (1987), 809 F.2d 1334.
23. William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. ITT Continental Baking Co. Inc. (1981), 668 F.2d 1014.
24. International Air Ind., Inc. v. American Excelsior Co. (1973), 517 F.2d 714.
25. Janich Bros. Inc. v. American Distilling Co. (1977), 570 F.2d 848.
26. Klein, Benjamin (1999), –An Economic Analysis of Microsoft's Conduct,— Antitrust Bulletin Vol. 14 (Fall) 38.
27. Arthur S. Langenderfer et al., Inc. v. S. E. Johnson Co. et al. (1984), 729 F.2d 1050.
28. Matsushita Electronic Industries Co. Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp. (1986), 106 S. Ct. 1348.
29. McGahee v. Northern Propane Gas Co. (1989), 858 F.2d 1487, 1504, 11th Cir., 1988, cert, denied, 490 U.S. 1084.
30. Meeks, James E. (1998), –Predatory Behavior as an Exclusionary Device in the Emerging Telecommunications Industry,— Wake Forest Law Review, 33, 125.
31. Morgan v. Ponder (1989), 892 F.2d 1355, 8th Cir.
32. Nader, Ralph (1997), –The Proper Goals of Antitrust: When Public and Private Interests Collide,— Loyola Consumer Law Report, 9, 115.
33. National Dairy! Products Corp. v. FTC (1969), 412 F.2d 605.
34. Posner, Richard (1979), –The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis,— University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 27, 925.
35. Roberts Waikiki U-Drive, Inc. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. (1980), 491 F. Supp. 1199.
36. Royall, M. Sean (1995), –Symposium: Post-Chicago Economics,— Antitrust Law Journal, 63 (2), 445.
37. Stearns Airport Equipment Co. v. FMC Corp. (1999), 170 F. 3d 518, 5th Cir.
38. Edward J. Sweeney and Sons, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc. (1980), 637 F. 2d 105.
39. The Economist, (1998), –The Trustbuster's New Tools,— (May 2) 62-64.
40. Transamerica Computer Co., Inc. v. International Business Machine Corp. (1983), 698 F.2d 1377.
41. United States v. Microsoft Corjy. (1998). 147 F.3d 935, 950. D.C. Cir.
42. Ursic, Michael L. and James G. Helgeson (1994), –Using Price as a Weapon: An Economic and Legal Analysis of Predatory Pricing,— Industrial Marketing Management. 23, 125.
43. Utah Pie Co. v. Continental Baking Co. (1967), 386 U.S. 685.
44. Valley Plymouth v. Studebaker-Packard Corp. (1963), 219 F. Supp. 608.
45. Weber v. Wynne (1977), 431 F. Supp 1048.
46. Barry Wright Corp. v. ITT Grinnell Corp. (1983), 724 F.2d 227.
47. Zerbe, Richard O. and Michael T. Mumford (1996), –Does Predatory Pricing Exist?: Economic Theory and the Courts after Brooke Group,— Antitrust Bulletin, 41, 977.