A unified approach to moving object detection in 2D and 3D scenes

Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition

Volumn 1, Issue , 1996, Pages 712-717

  Irani, Michal ^a   Anandan, P ^a  

^a SARNOFF CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CAMERAS; OBJECT RECOGNITION; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

3D SCENES; COMPLEXITY LEVELS; DEPTH VARIATION; DETECTION OF MOVING OBJECT; FLAT SURFACES; MOVING-OBJECT DETECTION; PROCESSING STEPS; UNIFIED APPROACH;

TWO DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 33747785850     PISSN: 10514651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICPR.1996.546117     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. G. Adiv. Inherent ambiguities in recovering 3D motion and structure from a noisy flow field. PAMI, 11:477-489, May 1989.
2. Y. Aloimonos, editor. Active Perception. 1993.
3. S. Ayer and H. Sawhney. Layered representation of motion video using robust maximum-likelihood estimation of mixture models and mdl encoding. In ICCV, pages 777-784, Cambridge, MA, June 1995.
4. J. Bergen, P. Anandan, K. Hanna, and R. Hingorani. Hierarchical model-based motion estimation. In ECCV, pages 237-252, May 1992.
5. J. Bergen, P. Burt, R. Hingorani, and S. Peleg. A three-frame algorithm for estimating two-component image motion. PAMI, 14:886-895, September 1992.
6. J. Costeira and T. Kanade. A multi-body factorization method for motion analysis. In ICCV, 1995.
7. T. Darrell and A. Pentland. Robust estimation of a multi-layered motion representation. In IEEE Workshop on Visual Motion, pages 173-178, October 1991.
8. M. Irani and P. Anandan. Parallax geometry of pairs of points for 3d scene analysis. In ECCV, 1996.
9. M. Irani and P. Anandan. A unified approach to moving object detection in 2d and 3d scenes. In D ARPA IU Workshop, 1996.
10. M. Irani, B. Rousso, and S. Peleg. Computing occluding and transparent motions. IJCV, 12:5-16, 1994.
11. M. Irani, B. Rousso, and S. Peleg. Recovery of egomotion using image stabilization. In CVPR, pages 454-460, Seattle, Wa., June 1994.
12. J. Koenderink and A. van Doom. Representation of local geometry in the visual system. Biol. Cybern., 55:367-375, 1987.
13. R. Kumar, P. Anandan, and K. Hanna. Direct recovery of shape from multiple views: a parallax based approach. In Proc 12th ICPR, 1994.
14. J. Lawn and R. Cipolla. Robust egomotion estimation from affine motion parallax. In ECCV, May 1994.
15. F. Meyer and P. Bouthemy. Region-based tracking in image sequences. In ECCV, May 1992.
16. H. Sawhney. 3d geometry from planar parallax. In CVPR, June 1994.
17. A. Shashua and N. Navab. Relative affine structure: Theory and application to 3d reconstruction from perspective views. In CVPR, pages 483-489, 1994.
18. W. Thompson and T. Pong. Detecting moving objects. IJCV, 4:29-57, 1990.
19. P. Torr and D. Murray. Stochastic motion clustering. In ECCV, 1994.
20. P. Torr, A. Zisserman, and S. Maybank. Robust detection of degenerate configurations for the fundamental matrix. In ICCV, pages 1037-1042, 1995.
21. J. Wang and E. Adelson. Layered representation for motion analysis. In CVPR, pages 361-366, June 1993.