The adoption of emergency contraceptive pills in Sweden: A repeated cross-sectional study among abortion applicants

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 85, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1142-1143

  Larsson, M ^a,c   Aneblom, G ^a   Eurenius, K ^a   Westerling, R ^b   Tyden T ^a,b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Abortion applicants; Attitude; Deregulation; Emergency contraception; Knowledge; Practice

Indexed keywords

LEVONORGESTREL; POSTCOITUS CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ABORTION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONDOM; EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION; FEMALE; HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION; HUMAN; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PILL; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SWEDEN;

ABORTION APPLICANTS; ABORTION, INDUCED; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AWARENESS; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVES, POSTCOITAL; CONTRACEPTIVES, POSTCOITAL, HORMONAL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DRUGS, NON-PRESCRIPTION; EMERGENCIES; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PREGNANCY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SWEDEN;

EID: 33747781816     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: 16000412     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016340500501897     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Larsson M, Eurenius K, Westerling R, Tydén T. Evaluation of a community based intervention regarding emergency contraception. BJOG. 2004;11:820-7.
2. Marston C, Meltzer H, Majeed A. Impact on contraceptive practice of making emergency hormonal contraception available over the counter in Great Britain: repeated cross sectional surveys. BMJ. 2005;331:271.
3. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed. New York: The Free Press; 1995.
4. Glasier A, Fairhurst K, Wyke S, Ziebland S, Seaman P, Walker J, et al. Advanced provision of emergency contraception does not reduce abortion rates. Contraception. 2004;69(5):361-6.