An integrated two-stage model for intelligent information routing

Decision Support Systems

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 362-374

  Fan, Weiguo ^a   Gordon, Michael D ^b   Pathak, Praveen ^c  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Genetic programming; Information retrieval; Information routing; Personalization; Text mining

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; ROUTERS; TEXT PROCESSING;

INFORMATION ROUTING; NEWS CHANNELS; PERSONALIZATION; TEXT MINING;

INFORMATION THEORY;

EID: 33747771325     PISSN: 01679236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2005.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ardissono L., Goy A., Petrone G., and Segnan M. Personalization in business to consumer interaction. Communications of the ACM 45 5 (2002 (May)) 52-53
2. Balderston J. Push aims to get smarter. InfoWorld 19 21 (1997) 1-2
3. Budzik J., Hammond K., and Birnbaum L. Information access in context. Knowledge Based Systems 14 (2001) 37-53
4. Chen L., and Sycara K. WebMate: a personal agent for browsing and searching. In: Sycara K.P., and Wooldridge M. (Eds). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents'98) (1998), ACM Press, New York 132-139
5. Fan W., Fox E., Pathak P., and Wu H. The effects of fitness functions on genetic programming-based ranking discovery for web search. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55 (2004) 628-636
6. Fan W., Gordon M., and Pathak P. A generic ranking function discovery frame-work by genetic programming for information retrieval. Information Processing & Management 40 (2004) 587-602
7. Fan W., Gordon M.D., and Pathak P. Discovery of context-specific ranking functions for effective information retrieval using genetic programming. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16 4 (2004) 523-527
8. W. Fan, M.D. Gordon, P. Pathak, Effective profiling of consumer information retrieval needs: a unified framework and empirical comparison, Decision support systems, Forthcoming.
9. Furnas G.W., Landauer T.K., Gomez L.M., and Dumais S.T. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Communications of the ACM 30 11 (1987) 947-971
10. Gibson P. Push versus pull news gathering. Information Today 14 5 (1997) 57
11. Harman D.K. Overview of the fourth text retrieval conference (TREC-4). In: Harman D.K. (Ed). Proceedings of the Fourth Text Retrieval Conference. NIST Special Publication 500-236 (1996) 1-24
12. Kohavi R., and John G. Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial Intelligence 97 (1997) 273-324
13. Leroy G., Lally A.M., and Chen H. The use of dynamic contexts to improve casual internet searching. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 21 3 (2003 (July)) 229-253
14. Lewis D.D. Applying support vector machines to the TREC-2001 batch filtering and routing tasks. Proceedings of Tenth Text Retrieval Conference (2001)
15. Liu F., Yu C., and Meng W. Personalized web search by mapping user queries to categories. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (2002), ACM Press 558-565
16. Liu H., and Motoda H. Feature selection for knowledge discovery and data mining (1998), Kluwer
17. Mitchell T.M. Machine learning (1997), McGraw Hill
18. Ng H., Goh W., and Low K.L. Feature selection, perceptron learning, and a usability case study for text categorization. Proceedings of the 20th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (1997), ACM press, New York, NY
19. Oard D.W., and Marchionini G. A conceptual framework for text filtering, CS-TR-3643 (1996), University of Maryland, College Park
20. Peppers D., and Rogers M. Enterprise one to one: tools for competing in the internet age (1997), Currency Doubleday, New York
21. Picarille L. Push comes to shove on web. Computer Reseller News 749 (1997 (Aug. 11)) 113-114
22. Pitkow J., Schutze H., Cass T., Cooley R., Turnbull D., Edmonds A., et al. Personalized search. Communications of the ACM 45 9 (2002 (September)) 50-55
23. Pretschner A., and Gauch S. Ontology based personalized search. Proceedings of 11th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (1999), IEEE Computer Society 391-398
24. Robertson S. On relevance weight estimation and query expansion. Journal of Documentation 42 (1986) 182-188
25. Robertson S. On term selection for query expansion. Journal of Documentation 46 (1990) 359-364
26. Robertson S.E., Walker S., Jones S., Hancock-Beaulieu M.M., and Gatford M. Okapi at TREC-4. In: Harman D.K. (Ed). Proceedings of the Fourth Text Retrieval Conference. NIST Special Publication 500-236 (1996) 73-97
27. Rocchio J.J. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In: Salton G. (Ed). The SMART retrieval system-experiments in automatic document processing (1971), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
28. Salton G. The SMART retrieval system: experiments in automatic document processing (1971), Prentice Hall, New Jersey
29. Salton G. Automatic text processing (1989), Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading, MA
30. Salton G., and Buckley C. Term weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management 24 5 (1988) 513-523
31. Singhal A., Salton G., Mitra M., and Buckley C. Document length normalization. Information Processing & Management 32 5 (1996) 619-633
32. Voorhees E.M. Variations in relevance judgments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness. Information Processing & Management 36 5 (2000) 697-716
33. Zobel J., and Moffat A. Exploring the similarity space. SIGIR Forum 32 1 (1998) 18-34