A comparative and evaluative study of cytological and histological grading system profile in malignant neoplasm of breast - An important prognostic factor

Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 199-202

  Meena, Sudha Pankaj ^a,b   Hemrajani, Deepika K ^a   Joshi, Narayani ^a  

^a SMS MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^b C/o Allied Electronics ^*  (India)

Author keywords

Breast carcinoma; Nuclear grading

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER GRADING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CYTOPATHOLOGY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROGNOSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS, MALE; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CYTODIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HISTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; INDIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS;

EID: 33747753815     PISSN: 03774929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Sondik EJ. Breast cancer trends, incidence, mortality and survival. Cancer 1994; 74:995-9.
2. Robinson IA, Mckee G, Nicholson A et al. Prognostic value of cytological grading of fine needle aspirates from breast carcinomas. Lancet 1994; 343:947-9.
3. Frierson HF, Wolber RA, Berean KW et al. Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating duct carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1995; 103:195-8.
4. Franzen S, Zajicek J. Aspiration biopsy in diagnosis of palpable lesion of the breast-critical review of 3479 consecutive biopsies. Acta Radiol 1968; 7:241.
5. Gupta SK, Ghosh AK, Chaudhary T, Duta SK, Talwar BL, Dutta BM. Aspiration cytology in diagnosis of breast cancer. Indian J Cancer 1979; 16:1-8.
6. Dobbs DJ. Role of nuclear grading of breast carcinoma in fine needle aspiration specimens. Acta Cytol 1993; 37:361-6.
7. Pandit AA, Parekh HJ. Cytologic grading of breast carcinoma. Comparison of four grading systems. J Cytol 2000; 17(1):39-44.
8. Greenhough RB. Varying degrees of malignancy in cancer of the breast. J Cancer Res 1925; 9:452-63.
9. nd ed. London: Pitman Medical Publishing Co. Ltd., 1968.
10. AFIP Manual of Histologic staining.36.
11. Dacie JV, Lewis SM. Practical hematology. 6th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1984.
12. Demeter JG, Waterman NG, Verdi GD. Familial, male breast carcinoma. Cancer 1990; 65:2342-3.
13. Eisenberg AJ, Hajdu SI, Wilhelmus J, Melamed MR, Kinne D. Preoperative aspiration cytology of breast tumors. Acta Cytol 1986; 30:135-46.
14. Barrows GH, Anderson TJ, Dixon JM. Fine needle aspiration of breast cancer. Cancer 1986; 58:1493-8.
15. Sutherland CM, Mather FJ. Long term survival and prognostic factors in patients with regional breast cancer (skin, muscle, and/or chest wall attachment). Cancer 1985; 55:1389-97.
16. Zoppi JA, Pellicer EM, Sundblad AS. Cytohistologic correlation of nuclear grade in breast carcinoma. Acta Cytol 1997; 41:701-4.
17. Moriquand J, Bolla DM. Value of cytoprognostic classification of breast carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 1986; 39:489-96.
18. Hunt CM, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Locker A, Pearson D, Blarney RW. Cytological grading system of breast carcinoma-a feasible proposition. Cytopathology 1990; 1(5):287-95.
19. Howell LP, Edwards RG, O' Sullivan D. Application of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson tumor grading system to fine needle aspirates of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol 1994; 101:262-5.