Taphonomy, time-averaging and lateral transport of the macrofossils of the Pilmatué Member of the Agrio Formation, Lower Cretaceous, Neuquén basin, Argentina;Análisis tafonómico e inferencia del grado de mezcla temporal y espacial de la macrofauna del Miembro Pilmatué de la Formacion Agrio, Cretácico Inferior de cuenca Neuquina, Argentina

Ameghiniana

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 311-326

  Lazo, Darío G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b CO NICET ^*  (Argentina)

Author keywords

Macrofauna; Storm influenced shoreface shelf; Taphonomy; Valanginian Hauterivian

Indexed keywords

BENTHOS; FOSSIL; HAUTERIVIAN; SEDIMENT ANALYSIS; STRATIGRAPHY; TAPHONOMY; VALANGINIAN;

ARGENTINA; NEUQUEN BASIN; SOUTH AMERICA;

AMMONOIDEA; ANTHOZOA; BIVALVIA; GASTROPODA; SERPULIDAE;

EID: 33747606303     PISSN: 00027014     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aguirre-Urreta, M.B. 2003. Early Cretaceous decapod Crustacea from the Neuquén Basin, west-central Argentina. Contributions to Zoology 72: 79-81.
2. Aguirre-Urreta, M.B. y Rawson, P.F. 1997. The ammonite sequence in the Agrio Formation (Lower Cretaceous), Neuquén Basin, Argentina. Geological Magazine 134: 449-458.
3. Aguirre-Urreta, M.B. y Rawson, P.F. 2003. Lower Cretaceous ammonites from the Neuquén Basin, Argentina: the Hauterivian genus0 Holcoptychites. Cretaceous Research 24: 589-613.
4. Aigner, T. y Reineck, H-E. 1982. Proximality trends in modern storm sands from the Helgoland Bight (North sea) and their implications for basin analysis. Senckenbergiana maritima 14: 183-215.
5. Aigner, T., Hagdom, H. y Mundlos, R. 1978. Biohermal, biostromal and storm generated coquinas in the Upper Muschelkalk. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Palädontologie Abhanlungen 157: 42-52.
6. Behrensmeyer, A.K., Kidwell, S.M. y Gastaldo, R.A. 2000. Taphonomy and paleobiology. Paleobiology 26: 103-147.
7. Brett, C.E. 1983. Sedimentology, facies and depositional environments of the Rochester Shale (Silurian; Wenlockian) in western New York and Ontario. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 53: 947-971.
8. Brett, C.E. y Baird, G.C. 1986. Comparative Taphonomy: A key to paleoenvironmental interpretation based on fossil preservation. Palaios 1: 207-227.
9. Bromley, R.G. 1990. Trace fossils. Biology and Taphonomy. Special Topics in Palaeontology 3, 280 pp.
10. Chazzotes, V., Le Campion-Alsumard, T. y Peyrot-Clausade, M. 1995. Bioerosion rates on coral reefs: interaction between macroborers, microborers and grazers (Moorea, French Polynesia). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 113: 189-198.
11. Cheel, R.J. y Leckie, D.A. 1993. Hummocky cross-stratification. En: V.P. Wright (ed.), Sedimentology Review 1, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 103-122.
12. Del Río, C.J., Martínez, S.A. y Scasso, R.A. 2001. Nature and origin of spectacular marine miocene shell beds of northeastern Patagonia (Argentina): paleoecological and bathymetric significance. Palaios 16: 3-25.
13. Dott, R.H.Jr. y Burgeois, J. 1982. Hummocky stratification: significance of its variable bedding sequences. Geological Society of America Bulletin 93: 663-680.
14. Fürsich, F.T. y Flessa, K.W. 1991. Ecology, taphonomy, and paleoecology of Recent and Pleistocene molluscan fauna of Bahía La Choya, northern Gulf of California. Zitteliana 18: 1-180.
15. Hampson, G.J. y Storms, J.E.A. 2003. Geomorphological and sequence stratigraphic variability in wave-dominated, shoreface-shelf parasequences. Sedimentology 50: 667-701.
16. Howard, J.D. y Reineck, H-E. 1981. Depositional facies of high-energy beach-to-offshore sequence: comparison with low-energy sequence. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 65: 807-830.
17. Kidwell, S.M. 1991. The stratigraphy of shell concentrations. En: P.A. Allison y D.E.G. Briggs (eds.), Taphonomy: Releasing the data locked in the fossil record, Volume 9 of Topics in Geobiology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 211-290.
18. Kidwell, S.M. 1998. Time-averaging in the marine fossil record: overview of strategies and uncertainties. Geobios 30: 977-995.
19. Kidwell, S.M. y Bosence, D.W.J. 1991. Taphonomy and time-averaging of marine shelly faunas. En: P.A. Allison y D.E.G. Briggs (eds.), Taphonomy: Releasing the data locked in the fossil record, Volume 9 of Topics in Geobiology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 115-209.
20. Lazo, D.G. 2004. [Análisis de concentraciones fósiles del Cretácico Inferior de cuenca Neuquina. Tesis doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, 337 pp., 7 perfiles. Inédito.].
21. Lazo, D.G. y Cichowolski, M. 2003. First plesiosaur remains from the Lower Cretaceous of the Neuquén basin, Argentina. Journal of Paleontology 77: 784-789.
22. Lazo, D.C., Cichowolski, M., Rodríguez, D.L. y Aguirre-Urreta, M.B. 2005. Lithofacies, palaeocology and palaeoenvironments of the Agrio Formation, Lower Cretaceous of the Neuquén Basin, Argentina. En: G.D. Veiga, L.A. Spalletti, J. Howell y E. Schwarz (eds.), The Neuquén Basin: A case study in sequence stratigraphy and basin dynamics, Geological Society of London, Special Publication 252: 295-315.
23. Leanza, H.A. 2003. Las sedimentitas huitrinianas y rayosianas (Cretácico Inferior) en el ámbito central y meridional de la cuenca Neuquina, Argentina. Serie Contribuciones Técnicas, Geología 2, Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino, 31 pp.
24. Leanza, H.A., Marchese, H.G. y Riggi, J.C. 1977. Estratigrafía del Grupo Mendoza con especial referencia a la Formación Vaca Muerta entre los paralelos 35° y 40° L.S., cuenca Neuquina-Mendocina. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 32: 190-208.
25. Legarreta, L. y Gulisano, C.A. 1989. Análisis estratigráfico secuencial de la cuenca Neuquina (Triásico Superior-Terciario Inferior). En: G.A. Chebli y L.A. Spalletti (eds.), Cuencas Sedimentarias Argentinas, Instituto Superior de Correlación Geológica (INSUGEO), Serie Correlación Geológica 6, pp. 221-243.
26. Marchese, H.G. 1971. Litoestratigrafía y variaciones faciales de las sedimentitas mesozoicas de la cuenca Neuquina, provincia de Neuquén, República Argentina. Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 26: 343-410.
27. Miller, A.I., Llewellyn, G., Parsons, K.M., Cummins, H., Boardman, M.R., Greenstein, B.J. y Jacobs, D.K. 1992. Effect of hurricane Hugo on molluscan skeletal distributions, Salt River Bay, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Geology 20: 23-26.
28. Morton, B. 1990. Corals and their bivalve borers-The evolution of a symbiosis. En: B. Morton (ed.), The Bivalvia, Proceedings of a memorial symposium in honour Sir Charles Maurice Yonge (1899-1986), Edinburgh, 1986, Hong Kong Univrsity Press, Hong Kong, pp. 11-46.
29. Norris, R.M. 1953. Buried oyster reefs in some Texas bays. Journal of Paleontology 27: 569-576.
30. Palma, R.M. y Lanés, S. 2001. Shell bed stacking patterns in the Chachao Formation (Early Valanginian) in Malargüe Area, Mendoza province, Neuquén Basin-Argentina. Carbonates and Evaporites 16: 168-180.
31. Puffer, E.L. y Emerson, W.K. 1953. The molluscan community of the oyster-reef biotope on the central Texas coast. Journal of Paleontology 27: 537-544.
32. Speyer, S.E. y Brett, C.E. 1986. Trilobite taphonomy and Middle Devonian taphofacies. Palaios 1: 312-327.
33. Stenzel, H. 1971. Oysters. En: R.C. Moore y C. Teichert (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology. Part N. Mollusca 6. Bivalvia Volume 3, University of Kansas and Geological Society of America, Lawrence, pp. N953-N1224.
34. Ten Hove, H.A. y van den Hurk, P. 1993. A review of recent and fossil serpulid "reefs"; actuopalaeontology and the "Upper Malm" serpulid limestones in NW Germany. Geologie en Mijnbouw 72: 23-67.