Effects of pulsed copper exposures on early life-stage Pimephales promelas

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1376-1382

  Bearr, Jonathan S ^a   Diamond, Jerry ^a   Latimer, Henry ^a   Bowersox, Marcus ^a  

^a TETRA TECH INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Copper; Frequency; Pimephales promelas; Pulse exposure; Recovery

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIOMASS; COPPER; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; WASTEWATER;

PIMEPHALES PROMELAS; PULSE EXPOSURE; RECOVERY PROCESS; SYNTHETIC WATER;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING;

CALCIUM CARBONATE; COPPER;

BIOMASS; COPPER; CYPRINID; POLLUTION EFFECT; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; SURVIVAL; TOXICITY;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYPRINIFORMES; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; LETHALITY; MORTALITY; NONHUMAN; PIMEPHALES PROMELAS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE RATE; SURVIVAL RATE; TOXICITY TESTING; WASTE WATER; AGING; ANIMAL; DRUG EFFECT; PHYSIOLOGY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

PIMEPHALES PROMELAS;

AGING; ANIMALS; BIOMASS; COPPER; CYPRINIDAE; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 33747515824     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1897/05-259R.1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1995. 1995 updates: Water-quality criteria documents for the protection of aquatic life in ambient water. EPA-820-B-96-001. Office of Water, Washington, DC.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms, 3rd ed. EPA-821-R-02-013. Office of Water, Washington, DC.
3. American Public Health Association. 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed. Washington, DC.
4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Draft update of ambient water quality criteria for copper. EPA-822-R-03-026. Washington, DC.
5. Handy RD. 1994. Intermittent exposure to aquatic pollutants: Assessment, toxicity, and sublethal responses in fish and invertebrates. Comp Biochem Physiol C 107:171-184.
6. Meyer JS, Gulley DD, Goodrich MS, Szmania DC, Brooks AS. 1995. Modeling toxicity due to intermittent exposure of rainbow trout and common shiners to monochloramine. Environ Toxicol Chem 14:165-175.
7. Ingersoll CG, Winner RW. 1982. Effect on Daphnia pulex (De Geer) of daily pulses to copper and cadmium. Environ Toxicol Chem 1:321-327.
8. Mancini JL. 1983. A method for calculating effects, on aquatic organisms, of time varying concentrations. Water Res 17:1355-1362.
9. Breck JE. 1988. Relationships among models for acute toxic effects: Applications to fluctuating concentrations. Environ Toxicol Chem 7:775-778.
10. McCarty LS, Mackay D. 1993. Enhancing ecotoxicological modeling and assessment: Body residues and modes of toxic action. Environ Sci Technol 27:1719-1728.
11. Hickie BE, McCarty LS, Dixon DG. 1995. A residue-based toxicokinetic model for pulse-exposure toxicity in aquatic systems. Environ Toxicol Chem 14:2187-2197.
12. Erickson RJ, Benoit DA, Mattson VR, Nelson HP Jr, Leonard EN. 1996. The effects of water chemistry on the toxicity of copper to fathead minnows. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:181-193.
13. Diamond J, Butcher JB. 2002. Effluent limits for fluctuating discharges: Alternate frameworks for water-quality criteria incorporating chemical frequency, magnitude, and duration. Project 98-HHE-3. Water Environment Research-Foundation, Alexandria, VA.
14. Naddy RB, Johnson KA, Klaine SJ. 2000. Response of Daphnia magna to pulsed exposures of chlorpyrifos. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:423-431.
15. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2000. Preliminary report: Intel-laboratory variability study of EPA short-term chronic and acute whole effluent toxicity test methods, Vol 1. EPA-821-R-00-028A. Office of Water, Washington, DC.
16. Paquin PR, Gorsuch JW, Apte S, Batley GE, Bowles KC, Campbell PGC, Delos CG, DiToro DM, Dwyer RL, Galvez F, Gensemer RW, Goss GG, Hogstrand C, Janssen CR, McGeer JC, Naddy RB, Playle RC, Santore RC, Schneider U, Stubblefield WA, Wood CM, Wu KB. 2002. The biotic ligand model: A historical overview. Comp Biochem Physiol C 133:3-35.
17. Kamunde C, Clayton C, Wood CM. 2002. Waterborne vs. dietary copper uptake in rainbow trout and the effects of previous waterborne copper exposure. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283:R69-R78.
18. McCarter JA, Roch M. 1984. Chronic exposure of coho salmon to sublethal concentrations of Cu. III. Kinetics of metabolism of metallothionein. Comp Biochem Physiol 77:83-87.
19. McDonald DG, Wood CM. 1993. Branchial mechanisms of acclimation to metals in freshwater fish. In Rankin JC, Jensen F, eds, Fish Ecophysiology. Chapman & Hall, London, UK, pp 270-331.
20. Marr JCA, Bergman HL, Lipton J, Hogstrand C. 1995. Differences in relative sensitivity of native and metals-acclimated brown and rainbow trout exposed to metals representative of the Clark Fork River, Montana. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:2016-2030.
21. 64Cu uptake and distribution among tissues of the European eel (Anguilla anguila). Comp Biochem Physiol C 114:29-235.
22. Taylor LN, McGeer JC, Wood CM, McDonald DG. 2000. The physiological effects of chronic copper exposure to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in hard and soft water: An evaluation of chronic indicators. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:2298-2308.
23. Maltby L. 1992. The use of the physiological energetics of Gammarus pulex to assess toxicity: A study using artificial streams. Environ Toxicol Chem 11:79-85.
24. Beyers D, Rice J, Clements W. 1999. Evaluating biological significance of chemical exposure to fish using a bioenergetics-based stressor-response model. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:823-829.