Teachers as executives

Theory into Practice

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 230-238

  French, Nancy K ^a   Chopra, Ritu V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747514153     PISSN: 00405841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4503_5     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Berliner, D. (1983a).The executive functions of teaching. Instructor, 93(2), 28-33, 36, 38, 40.
2. Berliner, D. C. (1983b). If teachers were thought of as executives: Implications for teacher preparation and certification. Paper prepared for the national Institute of Education Conference on State and Local Policy Implications of effective School Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED245357)
3. Brown, L., Long, E., Udvari-Solner, A., Davis, L., VanDeventer, P., Ahlgren, C., et al. (1989). The home school: Why students with severe intellectual disabilities must attend the schools of their brothers, sisters, friends, and neighbors. The Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 14, 1-7.
4. Chopra, R. V. (2002). Parent-paraeducator collaboration in inclusion: Reality and issues. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, Denver.
5. Chopra, R. V., & French, N. K. (2004). Paraeducator relationships with parents of students with significant disabilities. Remedial & Special Education (RASE), 25, 240-251.
6. Falvey, M. A. (1986). Community-based curriculum: Instructional strategies for students with severe handicaps. Baltimore: Brookes.
7. Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Thousand, J. (2003). What do special educators need to know and be prepared to do for inclusive schooling to work? Teacher Education and Special Education, 26(1), 42-50.
8. French, N. K. (1999). Paraeducator Supervision Academy: An outreach project to prepare school professionals to supervise paraeducators. In K. Murray (Ed.), 7th Annual CSPD Conference on Leadership and Change Monograph (pp. 60-63). Arlington, VA: Office of Special Education Programs and Na tional Association of State Directors of Special Education.
9. French, N. K. (2000). Preparing school professional to supervise paraprofessionals. In K. Murray (Ed.), 8th Annual CSPD Conference on Leadership and Change Monograph (pp. 145-150). Arlington, VA: Office of Special Education Programs and National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
10. French, N. K. (2003). Managing paraeducators in your school: How to hire, train, and supervise non-certified staff. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
11. French, N. K. (2004). Maximizing the services of paraeducators. In J. Burnette, (Ed.), Thriving as a special education teacher (pp. 41-48). Arlington, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education, Council for Exceptional Children.
12. French, N. K., & Chopra, R. V. (1999). Parent perspectives on the role of the paraeducator in inclusion. The Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 24, 259-272.
13. French, N. K., & Pickett, A. L. (1997). Paraprofessionals in special education: Issues for teacher educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 61-73.
14. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2003). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15. Fullan, M. (1990). Staff development, innovation and institutional development. In B. Joyce (Ed.), Changing school culture through staff development (pp. 3-25). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
16. Garman, N. B. (1986). Reflection, the heart of clinical supervision: A modern rationale for practice. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2(1), 1-24.
17. Garmston, R. (1987). How administrators support peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 44(5), 18-26.
18. Garmston, R. (1988, August). A call for collegial coaching. The Developer, p. 1, 4-6.
19. Glatthorn, A. A. (1997). Differentiated supervision (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
20. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 1990. Pub. L. 101-476, 104 Stat. 1103 (1990).
21. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, Pub. L. No. 105-17, 111 Stat. 37 (1997).
22. Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
23. Jackson, L., Ryndak, D., & Billingsley, F. (2000). Useful practices in inclusive education: A preliminary view of what experts in the field of moderate to severe disabilities are saying. The Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 25, 129-141.
24. McNulty, B. A., & Bailey, J. A. (2004). McRel's balanced leadership framework: School leadership that works. Journal for Effective Schools, 3(1), 17-33.
25. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
26. Rainforth, B., & York-Barr, J. (1997). Collaborative teams for students with severe disabilities: Integrating therapy and educational services. Baltimore: Brookes.
27. Sarason, S. (1991). The predictable failure of school reform: Can we change course before it's too late? San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28. Shulman, L. S. (1998). Teaching and teacher education among the professions [Charles W. Hunt Memorial Lecture]. New Orleans, LA: American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education.
29. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 22-28.
30. Stainback, S., Stainback, W., & Forest, M. (1989). Educating all students in the mainstream of education. Baltimore: Brookes.
31. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). Table of instructional aides 1989-2000 by state [Data file]. Available from http://nces.ed.gov/ccd/bat
32. Villa, R. A., Thousand, J. S., Nevin, A. I., & Malgeri, C. (1996). Instilling collaboration as a way of doing business in public schools. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 169-181.