Evaluating partnerships: A case study of integrated specialist mental health services

Health and Social Care in the Community

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 408-417

  Freeman, Tim ^a   Peck, Edward ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health Act 1999; Joint commissioning; Mental health services; Outcomes; Partnership working

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; SOCIAL WORK; UNITED KINGDOM;

GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; SOCIAL WORK; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 33747491525     PISSN: 09660410     EISSN: 13652524     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00658.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bratby L. (1999) State of the union. Police Review 27, 22-24.
2. Chen T.S. (1990) Theory Driven Evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
3. Clarke J. & Glendinning C. (2002) Partnership and the remaking of welfare governance. In: C. Glendinning, M. Powell & K. Rummery (Eds) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, pp. 33-50. The Policy Press, Bristol.
4. Clarke M. & Stewart J.S. (1997) Partnership and the Management of Co-operation. Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
5. Department of Health (1999) National Service Framework for Mental Health Services: Modern Standards and Service Models. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.
6. Freeman T. & Peck E. (2005) Commissioning and Provision of Adult Mental Health Services in Hertfordshire: Phase 2 Evaluation. Health Services Management Centre, Birmingham.
7. Freeman T. & Peck E. (in press) Performing governance: a partnership board dramaturgy. Public Administration, in press.
8. Fulcher H. (2000) Partners in crime reduction. Police Review 28, 19-20.
9. Halliday J., Asthana S.N.M. & Richardson S. (2004) Evaluating partnership: the role of formal assessment tools. Evaluation 10 (3), 285-303.
10. Home Office (1999) Statutory Partnerships: Pathfinder Series Report. Home Office, London.
11. Hudson B. & Hardy B. (2002) What is a 'successful' partnership and how can it be measured? In: C. Glendinning, M. Powell & K. Rummery (Eds) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, pp. 57-65. Policy Press, Bristol.
12. Hudson B., Young R., Hardy B. & Glendinning C. (2002) National Evaluation of Notifications for Use of the Section 31 Partnership Flexibilities of the Health Act 1999. National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Manchester.
13. Kazi M. (2003) Realist evaluation for practice. British Journal of Social Work 33, 803-818.
14. National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse (2002) Key Findings on Drug Treatment: Drug Action Teams Template Analysis. National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse, London.
15. Onyett S., Pillinger T. & Muijen M. (1997) Job satisfaction and burnout among members of community mental health teams. Journal of Mental Health 6 (1), 55-66.
16. Ovretveit J. (1998) Evaluating Health Interventions. Open University Press, Buckingham.
17. Pawson R. & Tilley N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
18. Peck E. & Freeman T. (2005) Reconfiguring PCTs: Influences and Options. Briefing paper prepared for the NHS Alliance. Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
19. Pickup S. (2004) Partnership and governance: the Hertfordshire experience. Journal of Integrated Care 12 (2), 14-19.
20. Powell M. & Glendinning C. (2002) Introduction. In: C. Glendinning, M. Powell & K. Rummery (Eds) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, pp. 1-14. The Policy Press, Bristol.
21. Rhodes R.A.W. (1999) Traditions and public sector reform: comparing Britain and Denmark. Scandinavian Political Studies 22 (4), 341-370.
22. Shaw I. (2000) Evaluating Public Programmes: Contexts and Issues. Ashgate, Aldershot.
23. Silverman D. (2000) Doing Qualitative Research A Practical Handbook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
24. Skelcher C. (2000) Changing images of the state: overloaded, hollowed-out, congested. Public Policy and Administration 15 (2), 3-19.
25. Stewart D. & Shamdasani P.N. (1990) Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
26. de Vaus D. A. (2002) Surveys in Social Research, 5th edn. Taylor & Francis, London.
27. Wilkin D., Gillam S. & Leese B. (2000) The National Tracker Survey of Primary Care Groups and Trusts: Progress and Challenges 1999/2000. National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, Manchester.