Taurek, numbers and probabilities

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 149-166

  Lawlor, Rob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aggregation; Numbers; Probabilities; Saving lives; Taurek; Weighing goods

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747460010     PISSN: 13862820     EISSN: 15728447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10677-005-9004-4     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Kamm, F., Nonconsequentualism in Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, Blackwell Publishers, 2000, pp. 205-227.
2. Mulgan, T., The Demands of Consequentialism, Oxford University Press, 2001.
3. Norcross, A., Comparing Harms: Headaches and Human Lives, Philosophy and Public Affairs 26(2) (1997), pp. 135-67.
4. Norcross, A., Speed Limits, Human Lives, and Convenience. A Reply to Ridge, Philosophy and Public Affairs 27(1) (1998), pp. 59-64.
5. Otsuka, M., Scanlon and the Claims of the Many Versus the One, Analysis 60 (2000), pp. 288-293.
6. Parfit, D., Innumerate Ethics, Philosophy and Public Affairs 7(4) (1978), pp. 285-301.
7. Ridge, M., How To Avoid Being Driven to Consequentialism: A Comment on Norcross, Philosophy and Public Affairs 27(1), (1998), pp. 50-58.
8. Scanlon, T., What We Owe to Each Other, Harvard University Press, 1998.
9. Taurek, J., Should the Numbers Count? Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (1977), pp. 293-316.