Corneal asphericity and visual function after wavefront-guided LASIK

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 83, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 605-610

  Tuan, Kuang Mon Ashley ^a,b   Chernyak, Dimitri ^a  

^a Advanced Medical Optics Inc   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast sensitivity function; Corneal asphericity; Customized shape; Oblate; Prolate; Standard conic shape; Wavefront guided LASIK

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; MULTIVARIABLE SYSTEMS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL METHODS; SURGERY; TOPOLOGY;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY FUNCTION; CORNEAL ASPHERICITY; CUSTOMIZED SHAPE; OBLATE; PROLATE; STANDARD CONIC SHAPE; WAVEFRONT-GUIDED LASIK;

WAVEFRONTS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORNEA CURVATURE; DEVICE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KERATOMILEUSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHOTOPIC VISION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOPOGRAPHY; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; ASTIGMATISM; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MYOPIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33747437576     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000232227.70122.b5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Holladay JT, Janes JA. Topographic changes in corneal asphericity and effective optical zone after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:942-7.
2. Somani S, Tuan KA, Chernyak D. Corneal asphericity and retinal image quality: a case study and simulations. J Refract Surg 2004;20:S581-5.
3. Guillon M, Bleshoy H. Comparative study of the visual performance of various aphakic corrections. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1983;61:851-9.
4. Hemenger RP, Tomlinson A, Caroline PJ. Role of spherical aberration in contrast sensitivity loss with radial keratotomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;30:1997-2001.
5. Cox I, Holden BA. Soft contact lens-induced longitudinal spherical aberration and its effect on contrast sensitivity. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:679-83.
6. Collins MJ, Brown B, Atchison DA, Newman SD. Tolerance to spherical aberration induced by rigid contact lenses. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1992;12:24-8.
7. deBrabander J, Chateau N, Bouchard F, Guidollet S. Contrast sensitivity with soft contact lenses compensated for spherical aberration in high ametropia. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:37-43.
8. Collins MJ, Franklin R, Davis BA. Optical considerations in the contact lens correction of infant aphakia. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:234-40.
9. Suzaki A, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Maeda N, Fujikado T. Evaluation of visual performance by a soft contact lens with intentionally increased spherical aberration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:ARVO E-abstract 691.
10. Applegate RA, Marsack JD, Ramos R, Sarver EJ. Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1487-95.
11. Marsack JD, Thibos LN, Applegate RA. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis 2004;4:322-8.
12. Cheng X, Bradley A, Thibos LN. Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics. J Vis 2004;4:310-21.
13. Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate RA. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis 2004;4:329-51.
14. Chen L, Singer B, Guirao A, Porter J, Williams DR. Image metrics for predicting subjective image quality. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:358-69.
15. Applegate RA. Glenn Fry award lecture 2002: wavefront sensing, ideal corrections, and visual performance. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:167-77.
16. Cheng X, Thibos LN, Bradley A. Estimating visual quality from wavefront aberration measurements. J Refract Surg 2003;19:S579-84.
17. Applegate RA, Ballentine C, Gross H, Sarver EJ, Sarver CA. Visual acuity as a function of Zernike mode and level of root mean square error. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:97-105.
18. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T. Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:201-7.
19. Tuan KM, Liang J. Improved contrast sensitivity and visual acuity after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: in-depth statistical analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32:215-20.
20. Schallhorn SC. Wavefront versus conventional LASIK: how do they differ in the real world? Refractive Report 2004;11:2.
21. Tuan K. Visual experience and patient satisfaction with wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:577-83.