The introduction and use of a tailored unified process - A case study

Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, 2005. 31st EUROMICRO Conference

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 196-203

  Westerheim, Hans ^a   Hanssen, Geir Kjetil ^a  

^a SINTEF ICT   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS; UNIFIED PROCESS;

KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; MOTIVATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33747429391     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EUROMICRO.2005.57     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. P. Krutchen, The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction, 2nd ed: Addison-Wesley, 2000.
2. J. Cameron, "Configurable Development Processes -Keeping the focus on what is being produced," Communications of the ACM, vol. 45, pp. 72-77, 2002.
3. T. Massoni, A. Sampaio, and P. Borba, "A RUP-Based Software Process Supporting Progressive Implementation," presented at OOPSALA'01, Tampa Bay, 2001.
4. F. Karlsson, P. J. Ågerfalk, and A. Hjalmarsson, "Method Configuration with Development Tracks and Generic Project Types," presented at CAiSE/IFIP8.1 International Workshop in Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design, Interlaken, Switzerland, 2001.
5. G. K. Hanssen, Westerheim, H., Bjørnson F.O., "Tailoring RUP to a defined project type: A case study," presented at PROFES, Oulo, Finland, 2005.
6. R. K. Yin, Case Study Research - Design and Methods: SAGE Publications, 1994.
7. MindJet, "MindManager," 5 ed, 2004.
8. C. Seaman, "Qualitative methods in empirical studies in software engineering," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 25, pp. 557-572, 1999.
9. D. Avison, F. Lau, M. Myers, and P. A. Nielsen, "Action Research," Communications of the ACM, vol. 42, pp. 94-97, 1999.
10. Q. I. P. Ldt, "Nvivo," 2002.
11. B. Kithenham, S. L. Pleeger, L. M. Pickard, P. W. Jones, D. C. Hoaglin, K. E. Emam, and J. Rosenberg, "Preliminary Guidelines for Empirical Research in Software Engineering," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 28, pp. 721-734, 2002.
12. C. Riemenschneider, Hardgrave B.C., Davis, F., "Explaining Software Developer Acceptance of Methodologies: A Comparison of Five Theoretical Models," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 28, pp. 11, 2002.
13. T. Dybå, Moe, N.B., Mikkelsen E.M., "An Empirical Investigation on Factors Affecting Software Developer Acceptance and Utilization of Electronic Process Guides," presented at Metrics 2004, Chicago, USA, 2004.
14. B. Henderson-Sellers, R. Dué, and I. Graham, "Third Generation OO Processes: A Critique of RUP and OPEN from a Project Management Perspective," presented at Software Engineering Conference, APSEC, 2000.