Protofit: A program for determining surface protonation constants from titration data

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1344-1356

  Turner, Benjamin F ^a   Fein, Jeremy B ^a  

^a University of Notre Dame   (United States)

Author keywords

Acid; Base; Data analysis; Mineral; Model

Indexed keywords

ACIDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PROTONS; SURFACE TREATMENT;

ACID-BASE TITRATION; PROTONATION CONSTANTS; SURFACE CHARGE; SURFACE PROTONATION;

TITRATION;

ACIDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PROTONS; SURFACE TREATMENT; TITRATION;

ACID; DATA PROCESSING; MODELING; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; OPTIMIZATION; SIMULATION; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 33747422146     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2005.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Chen J.F., Xia Y.X., and Choppin G.R. Derivative analysis of potentiometric titration data to obtain protonation constants. Analytical Chemistry 68 (1996) 3973-3978
2. Dzombak, D.A., Morel, F.M.M., 1990. Surface Complexation Modeling: Hydrous Ferric Oxide. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 393pp.
3. Fein J.B., Boily J., Yee N., Gorman-Lewis D., and Turner B.F. Potentiometric titrations of Bacillus subtilis cells and a comparison of modeling approaches. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 69 (2005) 1123-1132
4. Grunwald E. A differential method of measuring acid and base dissociation constants. Journal of the American Chemical Society 73 (1951) 4934-4938
5. Hayes K.F., Redden G., Ela W., and Leckie J.O. Surface complexation models: an evaluation of model parameter estimation using FITEQL and oxide mineral titration data. Journal of Colloid Interface Science 142 (1991) 448-469
6. Herbelin, A.L., Westall, J.C., 1999. FITEQL 4.0: a computer program for determination of chemical equilibrium constants from experimental data. Report 99-01. Department of Chemistry, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
7. Hook R., and Jeeves T.A. "Direct search" solution of numerical and statistical problems. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 8 (1960) 212-229
8. Kilpi S. A differential method of measuring acid and base dissociation constants. Journal of the American Chemical Society 74 (1952) 5296-5298
9. Parkhurst, D.L., Appelo, C.A.J., 1999. User's guide to PHREEQC (version 2)-a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. U.S. Geological Survey Water Investigations Report 99-4259, 312pp.
10. Perdue E.M., Reuter J.H., and Parish R.S. A statistical model of proton binding by humus. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 48 (1984) 1257-1263
11. Prelot B., Charmas R., Zarzycki P., Thomas F., Villieras F., Piasecki W., and Rudzinski W. Application of the theoretical 1-pK approach to analyzing proton adsorption isotherm derivatives on heterogeneous oxide surfaces. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 106 (2002) 13280-13286
12. Stumm, W., 1992. Chemistry of the Solid-Water Interface. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 428pp.
13. Turner, B.F., 2005. ProtoFit Version 2.0, a program for determining surface speciation constants from titration data: user's manual. Department of Civil Engineering and Geological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, 27pp.
14. van Slyke D.D. On the measurement of buffer values and on the relationship of buffer value to the dissociation constant of the buffer and the concentration and reaction of the buffer solution. Journal of Biological Chemistry 52 (1922) 525-570
15. Villieras F., Cases J.M., Francois M., Michot L.J., and Thomas F. Texture and surface energetic heterogeneity of solids from modeling of low pressure gas adsorption isotherms. Langmuir 8 (1992) 1789-1795
16. Villieras F., Michot L.J., Bardot F., Cases J.M., Francois M., and Rudzinski W. An improved derivative isotherm summation method to study surface heterogeneity of clay minerals. Langmuir 13 (1997) 1104-1117
17. 4 concentration. Environmental Science & Technology 29 (1995) 951-959