The impact of formal education and training on urodynamic practice in the United Kingdom: A survey

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 406-410

  Ellis Jones, Julie ^a   Swithinbank, Lucy ^a   Abrams, Paul ^a  

^a SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Education; Guidelines; Standardisation; Training; Urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HEALTH SURVEY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; TRAINING; UNITED KINGDOM; URODYNAMICS;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PHYSICAL THERAPY (SPECIALTY); PHYSICIANS; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPECIALTIES, NURSING; URODYNAMICS; UROLOGY;

EID: 33747367934     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20240     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Abrams P. 1997. Urodynamics. 2nd edition. London: Springer. pp 17-117.
2. Chapple CR, MacDiarmid SA. 2000. Urodynamics made easy. 2nd edition. London: Churchill Livingstone. pp 1-4.
3. Department of Health. 1998. A first class service: Quality in the new NHS. Great Britain: DoH.
4. Doel M, Sawdon C, Morrison D. 2002. Learning, practice and assessment: Signposting the portfolio. London: Kingsley.
5. European Commission. 1999. 'Best Practice': State of the art and perspectives in the EU for improving the effectiveness and efficiency of European health systems. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the EU.
6. Garcarz W, Chambers R, Ellis S. 2003. Make your Healthcare organisation a learning organisation. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
7. Gray M. 2004. Characteristics of north american urodynamic centres: Measuring lower urinary tract filling and storage function. Urol Nurs Feb 01.
8. Hewitt-Taylor J. 2003. Developing and using clinical guidelines. Nurs Stan 18:41-4.
9. Hoban V. 2003. Joining forces. Nurs Tim 99:36-8.
10. Hosker G, Kilcoyne P, Lord J, et al. 1997. Urodynamic services, personnel and training in the UK. Br J Urol 79:159-62.
11. International Continence Society. 2003. Standards for urodynamic training. http://www.icsoffice.org.
12. Phelan P, Reynolds P. 1996. Argument and evidence: Critical analysis for the social sciences. London: Routledge.
13. Royal Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2002. Special skills training module: Urodynamics. London: RCOG Press.
14. Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. 2002. Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21:261-74.
15. Shaw C, Williams K, Assassa P, et al. 2000. Patient satisfaction with Urodynamics: A qualitative study. J Adv Nurs 32:1356-63.
16. Sriram R, Ojha H, Farrar D. 2002. An audit of urodynamic standardisation in the west midlands, UK. Br J Urol 90:53.