Healos and bone marrow aspirate used for lumbar spine fusion: A case controlled study comparing healos with autograft

Spine

Volumn 31, Issue 18, 2006, Pages

  Neen, Daniel ^a   Noyes, David ^b   Shaw, Matthew ^a   Gwilym, Stephen ^c   Fairlie, Neil ^a   Birch, Nicholas ^a  

^a BMI Three Shires Hospital   (United Kingdom)

^b MILTON KEYNES GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone marrow aspirate; Fusion; Healos; Iliac bone graft

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN TYPE 1; HYDROXYAPATITE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; BONE CONDUCTION; BONE MARROW; BONE MARROW ASPIRATE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ILIAC CREST; LOW BACK OUTCOME SCORE; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION SCORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROLO ECONOMIC SCORE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY;

BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMPLANTS, EXPERIMENTAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33747364474     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000232028.97590.12     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Gwilym S, Neen D, Birch N. Clinical outcomes of circumferential spinal fusion do not match radiologic results despite rigorous patient selection. Internet J Spine Surg [Serial Online]. 2005;(1):2.
2. Boden SD. Overview of the biology of lumbar spine fusion and principles for selecting a bone graft substitute. Spine 2002;27(suppl 1):26 -31.
3. Banwart JC, Asher MA, Hassanein RS. Iliac crest bone graft donor site morbidity: a statistical evaluation. Spine 1995;20:1055-60.
4. Castro FP, Holt RT, Majd MM, et al. A cost analysis of two anterior cervical fusion procedures. J Spinal Disord 2000;13:511-4.
5. Tay BK, Le AX, Heilman M, et al. Use of a collagen-hydroxyapatite matrix in spinal fusion: a rabbit model. Spine 1998;23:2276-81.
6. Mirovsky Y, Neuwirth MG. Comparison between the outer table and intracortical methods of obtaining autogenous boner graft from the iliac crest. Spine 2000;25:1722-5.
7. Burstein FD, Simms C, Cohen SR, et al. Iliac crest bone graft harvesting technique: a comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;5:34-9.
8. Schnee CL, Freese A, Ansell LV. Outcome analysis for adults with spondylolisthesis treated with posterolateral fusion and transpedicular screw fixation. J Neurosurg 1997;86:56-63.
9. Yousef JA, Wang JC, Salas VM,et al.Acost analysis of allograft versus iliac crest bone ICBG for graft in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J 2004;4(suppl 5):54.
10. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD. A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion: two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine 1993;18:2106-7.
11. Greenough CG, Fraser RD. Assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain. Spine 1992;17:36-41.
12. Daltroy LH, Cats-Baril WL, Katz JN, et al. The North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine 1996;21:741-9.
13. Blount KJ, Krompinger WJ, Maljanian R, et al. Moving towards a standard for spinal fusion outcomes assessment. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002;15:16-23.
14. Prolo DJ, Oklund SA, Butcher M. Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations: a paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine 1986;11:601-6.
15. Kornblum MB, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine 2004;29:726-34.