Time-domain response of a metal detector to a target buried in soil with frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

Volumn 6217 I, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Das, Y ^a  

^a DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic properties of soil; Humanitarian demining; Landmine detection; Magnetic susceptibility of soils; Magnetic viscosity; Pulsed induction metal detectors

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; SOILS; TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS; VISCOSITY;

ELECTROMAGNETIC PROPERTIES OF SOIL; HUMANITARIAN DEMINING; LANDMINE DETECTION; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SOILS; MAGNETIC VISCOSITY; PULSED INDUCTION METAL DETECTORS;

METAL DETECTORS;

EID: 33747359329     PISSN: 0277786X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.663970     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Y. Das, "A preliminary investigation of the effects of soil electromagnetic properties on metal detectors," in Proc. SPIE Conference on Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Mine-like Targets IX, 5415, pp. 677-690, (Orlando, FL, USA), April 2004.
2. Y. Das, "Electromagnetic induction response of a target buried in conductive and magnetic soil," in Proc. SPIE Conference on Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Mine-like Targets X, 5794, pp. 263-274, (Orlando, FL, USA), March 2005.
3. B. H.Candy, "Pulse induction time domain metal detector." United States Patent Number 5 576 624, November 1996.
4. G. A. Newman, G. W. Hohmann, and W. L. Anderson, "Transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional body in a layered earth," Geophysics 51(8), pp. 1608-1627, 1986.
5. S. Chikazumi, Physics of Magnetism, Wiley, New York, 1964.
6. G. R. Olhoeft, "Time dependent magnetization and magnetic loss tangents," Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, May 1972.
7. T. Lee, "The effect of a superparamagnetic layer on the transient electromagnetic response of a ground," Geophysical Prospecting 32, pp. 480-496, 1984.
8. L. R. Pasion, S. D. Billings, and D. Oldenburg, "Evaluating the effects of magnetic soils on TEM measurements for UXO detection," in Proceedings of the UXO/Countermine Forum, (Orlando, Florida), September 2002.
9. S. D. Billings, L. R. Pasion, D. W. Oldenburg, and J. Foley, "The influence of magnetic viscosity on electromagnetic sensors," in International Conference on Requirements and Technologies for the Detection, Removal and Neutralization of Landmines and UXO, H. Sahli, A. M. Bottoms, and J. Cornelis, eds., Proc. EUDEM2-SCOT - 2003 1, pp. 123-130, (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium), September 2003.
10. C. E. Mullins and M. S. Tite, "Magnetic viscosity, quadrature susceptibility, and frequency dependence of susceptibility in single-domain assemblies of magnetite and maghemite," Journal of Geophysical Research 78, pp. 804-809, February 1973.
11. M. Dabas, A. Jolivet, and A. Tabbagh, "Magnetic susceptibility and viscosity of soils in a weak time varying field," Geophys. J. Int. 108, pp. 101-109, 1992.
12. J. Dearing, Environmental Magnetic Susceptibility: Using the Bartington MS2 System, Chi Publishing, 35 Birches Lane, Kenilworth CV8 2AB, England, 1994.
13. G. F. West and R. C. Bailey, "An instrument for measuring complex magnetic susceptibility of soils," in Proc. SPIE Conference on Detection and Remediation Technologies for Mines and Mine-like Targets X, 5794, pp. 124-134, (Orlando, FL, USA), March 2005.
14. Y. L. Luke, Integrals of Bessel Functions, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 1962.
15. Y. Das, J. McFee, and R. Chesney, "Time domain response of a sphere in the field of a coil:theory and experiment," IEEE Transactions on GeoScience and Remote Sensing GE-22(4), pp. 360-367, 1984.