Multiple assessment in quality-of-life trials: How many questionnaires? How often should they be given?

Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 135-138

  Vickers, Andrew J ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Endpoint determination; Quality of life; Randomized trials

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA ANALYSIS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; HUMANS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 33747256244     PISSN: 1715894X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7200.2006.017     Document Type: Review

References (3)

1. Vickers AJ. How to measure quality of life in integrative oncology research. J Soc Integral Oncol 2006;4(2):100-3.
2. Frison L, Pocock SJ. Repeated measures in clinical trials: analysis using mean summary statistics and its implications for design. Stat Med 1992;11:1685-704.
3. Vickers AJ. How many repeated measures in repeated measures designs? Statistical issues for comparative trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2003;3:22.