Parallel evolution of larval morphology and habitat in the snail-killing fly genus Tetanocera

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1459-1474

  Chapman, E G ^a   Foote, B A ^a   Malukiewicz, J ^a   Hoeh, W R ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Parallel evolution; Phylogenetic comparative method; Phylogenetic niche conservatism; Sciomyzidae; Tetanocera

Indexed keywords

DNA;

DNA; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FLY; GENETIC STRUCTURE; HABITAT CORRIDOR; LARVA; MORPHOLOGY; PIGMENT;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; FLY; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; LARVA; PHYLOGENY; SNAIL; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; DIPTERA; DNA; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; LARVA; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LINKAGE (GENETICS); PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SNAILS;

GASTROPODA; TETANOCERA;

EID: 33747237312     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01132.x     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Armbruster, W.S. 2002. Can indirect selection and genetic context contribute to trait diversification? A transition-probability study of blossom-colour evolution in two genera. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 468-486.
2. Baum, D.A. & Larson, A. 1991. Adaptation reviewed: a phylogenetic methodology for studying character macroevolution. Syst. Zool. 40: 1-18.
3. Brooks, D.L. & McLennan, D.A. 1991. Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior: A Research Program in Comparative Biology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
4. Brooks, D.L. & McLennan, D.A. 1994. Historical ecology as a research programme: scope, limitations, and the future. In: Phylogenetics and Ecology (P. Eggleton & R. Vane-Wright, eds), pp. 1-27. Academic Press, London.
5. Collin, R. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among calyptraeid gastropods and their implications for the biogeography of marine speciation. Syst. Biol. 52: 618-640.
6. Creer, S., Malhotra, A. & Thorpe, R.S. 2003. Assessing the phylogenetic utility of four mitochondrial genes and a nuclear intron in the Asian pit viper genus, Trimeresurus: separate, simultaneous and conditional data combination analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20: 1240-1251.
7. Farris, J.S., Kallersjo, M., Kluge, A.G. & Bult, C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics. 10: 315-319.
8. Felsenstein, J. 1985a. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 1-15.
9. Felsenstein, J. 1985b. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
10. Felsenstein, J. 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Assoc., Inc., Sunderland, MA.
11. Ferrar, P. 1987. A guide to the breeding habits and immature stages of Diptera Cyclorrhapha (part 1: text), Sciomyzidae, p. 329-340 (part 2: figures), Sciomyzidae. In: Entomonograph. (L. Lyneborg, ed.), pp. 815-827. Vol 8, E. J. Brill/Scandanavian Science Press, Leiden & Copenhagen.
12. Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W.R., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek, R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 3: 294-299.
13. Foote, B.A. 1959. Biology and life history of the snail-killing flies belonging to the genus Sciomyza Fallen (Diptera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 52: 31-43.
14. Foote, B.A. 1961. Biology and Immature Stages of the Snailkilling Flies Belonging to the Genus Tetanocera (Diptera: Sciomyzidae), PhD thesis. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
15. Foote, B.A. 1971. Biology of Hedria mixta (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64: 931-941.
16. Foote, B.A. 1976. Biology and larval feeding habits of three species of Renocera (Diptera: Sciomyzidae) that prey on fingernail clams (Mollusca: Sphaeriidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 69: 121-133.
17. Foote, B.A. 1996a. Biology and immature stages of snail-killing flies belonging to the genus Tetanocera (Insecta: Diptera: Sciomyzidae). 1. Introduction and life histories of predators of shoreline snails. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 65: 1-12.
18. Foote, B.A. 1996b. Biology and immature stages of snail-killing flies belonging to the genus Tetanocera (Insecta: Diptera: Sciomyzidae). 2. Life histories of predators of snails of the family Succineidae. Ann. Carnegie Mus 65: 153-166.
19. Foote, B.A. 1999. Biology and immature stages of snail-killing flies belonging to the genus Tetanocera (Insecta: Diptera: Sciomyzidae) 3. Life histories of the predators of aquatic snails. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 68: 151-174.
20. Foote, B.A., Neff, S.E. & Berg, C.O. 1960. Biology and immature stages of Atrichomelina pubera (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 53: 192-199.
21. Förster, B. 1891. Die Insekten des 'Plattigen Steinmergels' von Brunstatt. Abh. Geol. Spez.-Karte Elsass-Lotheringen 3: 333-594.
22. Givnish, T.J. 1997. Adaptive radiation and molecular systematics: issues and approaches. In: Molecular Evolution and Adaptive Radiation (T. J. Givnish & K. J. Systma, eds), pp. 1-54. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Hassanin, A. & Douzery, E. 2003. Molecular and morphological phylogenies of Ruminantia and the alternative position of the Moschidae. Syst. Biol. 52: 206-228.
25. Hendy, M.D., Steel, M.A., Penny, D. & Henderson, I.M. 1988. Families of trees and consensus. In: Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis (H. H. Bock, ed.), pp. 355-362. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
26. Hennig, W. 1965. Die Acalyptratae des baltischen Bernsteins und ihre Bedeutung für die Erforschung der phylogenetischen Entwicklung dieser Dipteren-Gruppe. Stuttg. Beitr. Naturkd. 145: 1-215.
27. Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6: 65-70.
28. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
29. Johnson, K.P., McKinney, F. & Sorenson, M.D. 1999. Phylogenetic constraint on male parental care in the dabbling ducks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 759-763.
30. Jousselin, E., Rasplus, J.-Y. & Kjellberg, F. 2003. Convergence and coevolution in a mutualism: evidence from a molecular phylogeny of Ficus. Evolution 57: 1255-1269.
31. Kishino, H. & Hasegawa, M. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order of the Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29: 170-179.
32. Knutson, L.V. 1963. Biology and Immature Stages of Snail-killing Flies of Europe (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). PhD thesis, pp. 390.Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
33. Knutson, L.V. & Berg, C.O. 1964. Biology and immature stages of snail-killing flies: the genus Elgiva (Diptera: Sciomyzidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 57: 173-192.
34. Knutson, L.V. & Vala, J.C. 2002. An evolutionary scenario of Sciomyzidae and Phaeomyiidae (Diptera). Ann. Soc. Entomol. France 38: 145-162.
35. Lord, J., Westoby, M. & Leishman, M. 1995. Seed size and phylogeny in six temperate floras: constraints, niche conservatism, and adaptation. Am. Nat. 146: 349-364.
36. Losos, J.B. 1992. The evolution of convergent structure in Caribbean Anolis communities. Syst. Biol. 41: 403-420.
37. Losos, J.B., Duncan, J.I. & Schoener, T.W. 1994. Adaptation and constraint in the evolution of specialization of Bahamian Anolis lizards. Evolution 48: 1786-1798.
38. Losos, J.B., Jackman, T.R. Larson, A., de Qqeiroz, K. & Rodriguez-Schettino, L. 1998. Contingincy and determinism in replicated adaptive radiations of island lizards. Science 279: 2115-2118.
39. Maddison, W.P. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? Evolution 44: 539-557.
40. Maddison, D.R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious trees. Syst. Zool. 40: 315-328.
41. Maddison, W.P. 2000. Testing character correlation using pairwise comparisons on a phylogeny. J. Theor. Biol. 202: 195-204.
42. Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2000. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sinauer Association Inc., Sunderland, MA.
43. Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. 2003. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 1.05 http://mesquite-project.org..
44. Marinoni, L. & Mathis, W.N. 2000. A cladistic analysis of Sciomyzidae Fallen (Diptera). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 113: 162-209.
45. Martins, E.P. 2000. Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15: 296-299.
46. Martins, E.P. & Hansen, T.F. 1996. A microevolutionary link between phylogenies and comparative data. In: New Uses for New Phylogenies (P. H. Harvey, A. J. L. Brown, J. M. Smith & S. Nee, eds), pp. 273-288. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
47. McKitrick, M.C. 1993. Phylogenetic constraint in evolutionary theory: has it any explanatory power? Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 307-330.
48. Neff, S.E. & Berg, C.O. 1966. Biology and immature stages of malacophagous Diptera of the genus Sepedon (Sciomyzidae). Va. Agr. Exp. Stat. B. 566: 1-113.
49. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 255: 37-45.
50. Pagel, M. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Scr. 26: 331-348.
51. Pagel, M. 1999a. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401: 877-884.
52. Pagel, M. 1999b. The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 48: 612-622.
53. Pagel, M. 2000. Discrete, Version 4.0. A computer program distributed by the author.
54. Pagel, M. 2002. Multistate, Version 0.6. A computer program, distributed by the author.
55. Pagel, M., Meade, A. & Barker, D. 2004. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 53: 673-684.
56. Park, J-K. & O'Foighil, D. 2000. Sphaeriid and corbiculid clams represent separate heterodont bivalve radiations into freshwater environments. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 14: 75-88.
57. Patterson, T.B. & Givnish, T.J. 2002. Phylogeny, concerted convergence, and phylogenetic niche conservatism in the core Liliales: insights from rbcL and ndhF sequence data. Evolution 56: 233-252.
58. Pauly, G.B., Hillis, D.M. & Cannatella, D.C. 2004. The history of a Nearctic colonization: molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of the Nearctic toads (Bufo). Evolution 58: 2517-2535.
59. Posada, D. & Crandall, K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
60. Prager, E.M. & Wilson, A.C. 1988. Ancient origin of lactabumin from lysozyme: analysis of DNA and amino acid sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 27: 326-335.
61. Rice, W.R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
62. Scheffer, S.J. & Wiegmann, B.M. 2000. Molecular phylogenetics of the holly leafminers (Diptera: Agromyzidae: Phytomyza): species limits, speciation, and dietary specialization. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17: 244-255.
63. Schwarz, M.P., Bull, N.J. & Cooper, S.J.B. 2003. Molecular phylogenetics of allodapine Bees, with implications for the evolution of sociality and progressive rearing. Syst. Biol. 52: 1-14.
64. Shimodaira, H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51: 492-508.
65. Shimodaira, H. & Hasegawa, M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16: 1114-1116.
66. Shimodaira, H. & Hasegawa, M. 2001. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17: 1246-1247.
67. Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H. & Flook, P. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87: 651-701.
68. Swofford, D.L. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
69. Templeton, A.R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the humans and apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
70. Theobald, N. 1937. Les insectes fossiles des terrains oligocènes de France. G. Thomas, Nancy. 473 + [1] p.
71. Vermeij, G.J. & Dudley, R. 2000. Why are there so few evolutionary transitions between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 70: 541-554.
72. Wagner, P.J. 1995. Testing evolutionary constraints hypotheses with early Paleozoic gastropods. Paleobiology 21: 248-272.
73. Whiting, M.F., Bradler, S. & Maxwell, T. 2003. Loss and recovery of wings in stick insects. Nature 421: 264-267.
74. Wiegmann, B.M., Yeates, D.K., Thorne, J.L. & Kishino, H. 2003. Time flies, a new molecular time scale for brachyceran fly evolution without a clock. Syst. Biol. 52: 745-756.