Tools for Collaboration: Using and Designing Tools in Interorganizational Economic-Crime Investigation

Mind, Culture, and Activity

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 133-152

  Puonti, Anne ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b National Bureau of Investigation Finland   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747213830     PISSN: 10749039     EISSN: 15327884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327884mca1102_4     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alvesalo, A.,& Tombs, S. (2001a). The emergence of a "war" on economic crime: The case of Finland. Business and Politics, 3, 239-267
2. Alvesalo, A.,& Tombs, S. (2001b). Can economic crime control be sustained? The case of Finland. Innovation. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 14, 35-53
3. Béguin, P. (2003). Design as a mutual learning process between users and designers. Interacting with Computers, 15, 709-730
4. Beeby, M.,& Booth, C. (2000). Networks and inter-organizational learning: A critical review. The Learning Organization, 7. Retrieved January, 25, 2001, from http://www.emerald-library.com/brev/11907bb1.htm
5. Beniger, J. R. (1986). The control revolution. Technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
6. Bowker, G. C. (2000). Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science, 30, 643-683
7. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1992). Enacting design for the workplace. In P. S. Adler & T. A. Winograd (Eds.), Usability: Turning technologies into tools (pp. 164-197). New York: Oxford University Press
8. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
9. Burawoy, M. (1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory, 16, 4-33
10. Button, G., & Harper, R. (1996). The relevance of "work-practice" for design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 263-280
11. Christiansen, E. (1996). Tamed by a rose: Computers as tools in human activity. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness. Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 195-198). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
12. Clarke, A. E., & Fujimura, J. F. (1992). What tools? Which jobs? Why right? In A. E. Clarke & J. H. Fujimura (Eds.), The right tools for the job (pp. 3-43). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
13. Cole, M.,& Engeström, Y. (1993).Acultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). New York: Cambridge University Press
14. De Bruijn, H. A., & ten Heuvelhof, E. F. (1998). A contextual approach to policy instruments. In B. G. Peters & F. K. M. Van Nispen (Eds.), Public policy instruments: Evaluating the tools of public administration (pp. 69-84). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
15. De Solla Price, D. (1984). The science/technology relationship, the craft of experimental science, and policy for the improvement of high technology innovation. Research Policy, 13, 3-20
16. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit
17. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R.,& Punamäki, R. -L. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
18. Fleck, J. (2002, November). The structure of technological evolutions: Linear models, configurations, and systems development. Paper presented to Nobel Symposium, Science and Industry in the 20th Century, Stockholm
19. Hasu, M. (2000). Constructing clinical use: An activity-theoretical perspective on implementing new technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12, 369-382
20. Hasu, M., & Engeström, Y. (2000). Measurement in action: An activity-theoretical perspective on producer-user interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 61-89
21. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
22. Huxham, C. (1996). Collaboration and collaborative advantage. In C. Huxham (Ed.), Creating collaborative advantage. London: Sage
23. Keller, C. M., & Keller, J. D. (1996). Cognition and tool use. The blacksmith at work. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
24. Keller, C. M.,& Keller, J. D. (1999). Imagery in cultural tradition and innovation. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 6, 3-32
25. Kraan, D. J. (1998).Apublic choice approach to the selection of policy instruments. In B. G. Peters& F.K.M. Van Nispen (Eds.), Public policy instruments: Evaluating the tools of public administration. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
26. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
27. Lynch, M. (1985). Discipline and the material form of images: An analysis of scientific visibility. Social Studies of Science, 15, 37-66
28. Manning, P. K. (2001). Information technology in the police context: The "sailor" phone. In J. A. Yates & J. Van Maanen (Eds.), Information technology and organizational transformation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
29. Miettinen, R. (1998). Object construction and networks in research work: The case of research on cellulose-degrading enzymes. Social Studies of Science, 28 (3), 423-463
30. Ministry of Finance. (1999a). Viranomaisyhteistyön kehittäminen. Työryhmän loppuraportti [Developing collaboration between authorities: Final project report]. Helsinki, Finland: Author
31. Ministry of Finance. (1999b). Harmaan talouden projektin loppuraportti [Final report of the project on grey economy]. Helsinki, Finland: Author
32. Nardi, B., & O'Day, V. (1999). Information ecologies. Using technology with heart. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
33. Norman, D. (1993). Things that make us smart. Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books
34. Norros, L., Hukki, K., Haapio, A., & Hellevaara,M. (1998). Päätöksenteko komentosillalla luotsaustilanteessa [Decision making on bridge in piloting situations]. Espoo, Finland: Valtion teknillinen tutkimuslaitos
35. Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-145
36. Puonti, A. (2003). Collaboration as learning challenge. Constructing common understanding between police officers and tax inspectors in a tax crime case. Police Practice and Research, 4, 131-147
37. Puonti, A. (2004). Searching for synchrony. Public Management Review, 6(1), 55-74
38. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions. The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
39. Tenner, E. (1996). Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. New York: Knopf
40. Von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. (2002). Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48, 821-833
41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The psychology of higher mental functions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
42. Westerberg, K. (2000). The important activity. Work, tools and tensions of municipal middle managers in elder care. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University, Department of Applied Psychology
43. Yates, J. A. (1989). Control through communication. The rise of system in American management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press