Multiobjective strategic evaluation for urban development in Kaohsiung, Taiwan: Case study

Journal of Urban Planning and Development

Volumn 132, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 160-165

  Teng, Junn Yuan ^a   Huang, Wen Chih ^b   Huang, Miin Jye ^b  

^a HUAFAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN OCEAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Case reports; Harbors; Taiwan; Urban development

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

CASE REPORTS; DEVELOPMENT PLAN; MULTIOBJECTIVE STRATEGIC EVALUATION; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

URBAN PLANNING;

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; HARBOR; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN ECONOMY; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN TRANSPORT;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; KAOHSIUNG; TAIWAN;

EID: 33747204846     PISSN: 07339488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2006)132:3(160)     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bovaird, T. (2002). "Strategy evaluation in a multi-stakeholder environment." Proc., EURAM Conf., Stockholm, Sweden.
2. David, F. R. (2001). Strategic management, concepts and cases, 8th Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
3. Dyson, R. G. (1990). Strategic planning: Models and analytical techniques, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
4. Dyson, R. G., and Foster, M. J. (1980). "Effectiveness in strategic planning." Eur. J. Oper. Res.EJORDT0377-2217, 5(3), 163-170.
5. Foster, M. J., and Foster, D. N. (1982). "Assessing the effectiveness of strategic planning." OmegaOMEGAG0305-0483, 10(1), 19-23.
6. Hill, M. (1968). "A goals-achievement matrix for evaluating alternative plans." J. Am. Institute Town Planners, 34(1), 19-38.
7. Hill, M. (1973). Planning for multiple objectives: An approach to the evaluation of transportation plans, Monograph No. 5, Regional Science Research Institute, Philadelphia.
8. Hope, J., and Hope, T. (1997). Competing in the third wave: The ten key management issues of the information age, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
9. Huang, M.-J., Huang, W.-C., Teng, J.-Y., and Wu, S.-C. (2002). "Competitiveness evaluation for Eastern Asian container ports by using grey relational analysis method." J. Grey Syst.JGSYE30957-3720, 14(3), 139-50.
10. Hui, E. C. M., Seabrooke, W., and Wong, G. K. C. (2004). "Forecasting cargo throughput for the Port of Hong Kong: Error correction model approach." J. Urban Plann. Dev.JUPDDM0733-9488, 130(4), 195-203.
11. Hwang, C. L., and Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications, Springer, New York.
12. Lam, W. H. K., Ng, P. L. P., Seabrooke, W., and Hui, E. C. M. (2004). "Forecasts and relability analysis of port cargo throughput in Hong Kong." J. Urban Plann. Dev.JUPDDM0733-948810.1061/ (ASCE)0733-9488(2004)130:3(133), 130(3), 133-144.
13. Lee, K.-L., Huang, W.-C., Kuo, M.-S., and Lin, S.-C. (2001). "Competitiveness model of international distribution park using the virtual value chain analysis." J. Eastern Asia Society Transportation Studies, 4(4), 313-325.
14. Nijkamp, P., and Voogd, H. (1985). An introduction to multicriteria evaluation: Multiple criteria decision methods and applications, Springer, London.
15. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations, Free Press, New York.
16. Santosa Tourism Bureau. (2000). Santosa sightseeing brochure, Singapore.
17. Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave, Bantam Books, New York.
18. Verhoeff, J. M. (1981). "Seaport competition: Some fundamental and political aspects." Maritime Policy Manage.ZZZZZZ0308-8839, 8(1), 49-60.
19. Voogd, H. (1983). Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning, Pion, London.
20. World Bank. (2001). The World Bank port reform toolkit, World Bank, Washington, D.C.,