Argument schemes and critical questions for heterogeneous agents to argue over the viability of a human organ for transplantation

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-06-01, Issue , 2006, Pages 105-111

  Tolchinsky, Pancho ^a   Modgil, Sanjay ^b   Cortés, Ulises ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b IMPERIAL CANCER RESEARCH FUND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; CARREL SYSTEM; DELIBERATION; HUMAN ORGANS;

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; DECISION MAKING; SOFTWARE AGENTS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

EID: 33747197421     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Atkinson, K. M.; Bench-Capon, T. J. M.; and McBurney, P. 2004. A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument for proposals over action. In Rahwan, I.; Moraitis, P.; and Reed, C., eds., Proc. First International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2004). Springer.
2. Cooper, R. 2002. Modelling High-Level Cognitive Processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Cortés, U.; Vázquez-Salceda, J.; López-Navidad, A.; and Caballero, F. 2000. UCTx: a multi-agent approach to model a transplant coordination unit. In Proceedings of the 3rd. Congrés Català dIntelligència Artificial.
4. Dung, P. M. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77:321-357.
5. López-Navidad, A., and Caballero, F. 2003. Extended criteria for organ acceptance: Strategies for achieving organ safety and for increasing organ pool. Clin Transplant, Blackwell Munksgaard 17:308-324.
6. Modgil, S.; Tolchinsky, P.; and Cortés, U. 2005. Towards formalising agent argumentation over the viability of human organs for transplantation. In MICAI 2005.
7. OCATT. Organització Catalana de Transplantaments (OCATT). http://www10.gencat.net/catsalut/ocatt/en/htm/index.htm
8. . ONT. Organización Nacional de Transplantes. http://www.msc.es/ont.
9. Reed, C., and Walton, D. 2004. Towards a formal and implemented model of argumentation schemes in agent communication. In Rahwan, I.; Moraitis, P.; and Reed, C., eds., ArgMAS, volume 3366 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 19-30. Springer.
10. Tolchinsky, P.; Cortés, U.; Nieves, J.; Caballero, F.; and López-Navidad, A. 2005. Using arguing agents to increase the human organ pool for transplantation. In 3rd Workshop on Agents Applied in Health Care (IJCAI-05).
11. Vázquez-Salceda, J.; Cortés, U.; Padget, J.; López-Navidad, A.; and Caballero, F. 2003. The organ allocation process: a natural extension of the CARREL Agent-Mediated Electronic Institution. AiCommunications.
12. Walton, D. N. 1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.