Gender, politics and political science: A reply to Michael Moran

Politics

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 203-205

  Childs, Sarah ^a   Krook, Mona Lena ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENDER; POLITICS;

EID: 33747165308     PISSN: 02633957     EISSN: 14679256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00270.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Carver, T. (1996), Gender is not a Synonym for Women, Boulder, Col.: Lynne Rienner.
2. Childs, S. and M.L. Krook (2006), 'Gender and Politics: The State of the Art', Politics 26(1), pp. 18-28.
3. Childs, S. and M.L. Krook (forthcoming), 'Should Feminists Give up on Critical Mass? A Contingent Yes', Politics & Gender 2(2).
4. Krook, M.L. and J. Squires (2006), 'Gender Quotas in British Politics: Multiple Approaches and Methods in Feminist Research', British Politics 1(1), pp. 44-66.
5. Lawless, J.L. and R.L. Fox (2005), It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. McCall, L. (2005), 'The Complexity of Intersectionality', Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30(3), pp. 1771-1800.
7. Moran, M. (2006), 'Gender, Identity and the Teaching of British Politics: A Comment', Politics 26(3), pp. 200-202.
8. Perrigo, S. (1999), 'Women, Gender and New Labour'in G.R.Taylore (ed.), The Impact of New Labour, New York: St Martin's Press, pp. 162-176.
9. Randall, V. (2002), 'Feminism' in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds.), Theory and Methods in Political Science, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 109-130.
10. Russell, M. (2005), Building New Labour: The Politics of Party Organisation, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
11. Stokes, W. (2005), Women in Contemporary Politics, Cambridge: Polity.