Contingency management treatments

British Journal of Psychiatry

Volumn 189, Issue AUG., 2006, Pages 97-98

  Petry, Nancy M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COCAINE;

DRUG MISUSE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PSYCHOTHERAPY; REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; URINALYSIS;

BEHAVIOR THERAPY; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TOKEN ECONOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33747152302     PISSN: 00071250     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.022293     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Festingger, D. S., Marlowe, D. B., Croft, J. R., et al (2005) Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 78, 275-281.
2. Higgins, S. T., Budney, A. J., Bickel, W. K., et al (1994) Incentives improve outcome in outpatient behavioral treatment of cocaine dependence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 568-576.
3. Higgins, S. T., Wong, C. J., Badger, G. J., et al (2000) Contingent reinforcement increases cocaine abstinence during outpatient treatment and I year of follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 64-72.
4. Lussier, J. P., Heil, S. H., Mongeon, J. A., et al (2006) A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction, 101, 192-203.
5. McGovern, M. P., Fox, T. S. & Xie, H. (2004) A survey of clinical practices and readiness to adopt evidence-based practices: dissemination research in an addiction treatment system. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 26, 305-312.
6. Peirce, J. M., Petry, N. M., Stitzer, M. L., et al (2006) Lower-cost incentives increase stimulant abstinence in methadone maintenance community treatment: results of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network Multi-site Study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 201-208.
7. Petry, N. M. (2000) A comprehensive guide for the application of contingency management procedures in standard clinic settings. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 58, 9-25.
8. Petry, N. M., Martin, B., Cooney, J. L., et al (2000) Give them prizes and they will come: contingency management for the treatment of alcohol dependence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 250-257.
9. Petry, N. M. & Martin, B. (2002) Lower-cost contingency management for treating cocaine-abusing methadone patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 70, 398-405.
10. Petry, N. M., Alessi, S. M., Tedford, J., et al (2005a) Vouchers versus prizes: contingency management for treatment of substance abusers in community settings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1005-1114.
11. Petry, N. M., Peirce, J. M., Stitzer, M. I., et al (2005b) Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: a national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study. Archives of General Psychiatry 62, 1148-1156.
12. Petry, N. M., Kolodner, K. B., Li, R., et al (2006) Prize-based contingency management does not increase gambling. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, in press.