In response to: De Witt L. & Ploeg J. (2006) Critical appraisal of rigor in interpretive phenomenological nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 55(2), 215-229

Journal of Advanced Nursing

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 643-645

  Sandelowski, Margarete ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; NOMENCLATURE; NURSING RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHY;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHY, NURSING; RESEARCH DESIGN; TERMINOLOGY; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 33747138559     PISSN: 03092402     EISSN: 13652648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04009.x     Document Type: Letter

References (9)

1. de Witt L. & Ploeg J. (2006) Critical appraisal of rigor in interpretive phenomenological nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 55(2), 215-229.
2. Elliott J. (2005) Using Narrative in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage, London.
3. Guba E. & Lincoln Y.S. (1981) Effective Evaluation. Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco, CA.
4. Maxwell J.A. (1992) Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review 62, 279-300.
5. Sandelowski M. (1986) The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science 8(3), 227-237.
6. Sandelowski M. (1993) Rigor, or rigor mortis: the problem of rigor in qualitative research revisited. Advances in Nursing Science 16(2), 1-8.
7. Sandelowski M. (1996) Truth/storytelling in nursing inquiry. In Truth in Nursing Inquiry (Kikuchi J.F. Simmons H. & Romyn D.M., eds), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 111-124.
8. Sandelowski M. (2006) "Meta-jeopardy": the crisis of representation in qualitative metasynthesis. Nursing Outlook 54, 10-16.
9. Sandelowski M., & Barroso J. (2003) Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative Health Research 13, 905-923.