The condition of uniqueness in manufacturing process representation by performance/quality indicators

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 567-580

  Franceschini, Fiorenzo ^a   Galetto, Maurizio ^a   Maisano, Domenico ^a   Viticchiè, Luciano ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Metrics; Performance indicators; Performance measurements; Quality indicators; Uniqueness condition

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; LOGISTICS; MARKETING; METRIC SYSTEM; NUMERICAL METHODS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY CONTROL;

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS; QUALITY INDICATORS; UNIQUENESS CONDITIONS;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33747132618     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.762     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Kerr S. On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. Academy of Management Journal 1975; 18:769-783.
2. Mock TJ, Grove HD. Measurement, Accounting and Organizational Information. Wiley: New York, 1979.
3. Edwards JB. The Use of Performance Measures. Institute of Management Accountants: Montvale, NJ, 1986.
4. Galbraith L, Miller WA, Greene TJ. Pull system performance measures: A review of approaches for system design and control. Production Planning and Control 1991; 2(1):24-35.
5. Galbraith L, Greene TJ. Manufacturing system performance sensitivity to selection of product design metrics. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 1995; 14(2):71-79.
6. Hauser J, Katz G. Metrics; you are what you measure! European Management Journal 1998; 16(5):517-528.
7. Caplice C, Sheffi Y. A review and evaluation of logistics metrics. The International Journal of Logistics Management 1994; 5(2): 11-28.
8. Perrin B. Effective use and misuse of performance measurement. American Journal of Evaluation 1998; 19(3):367-379.
9. Winston JA. Performance indicators - promises unmet: A response to Perrin. American Journal of Evaluation 1999; 20(1):95-99.
10. Performance-Based Management Special Interest Group (PBM SIG). The Performance-Based Management Handbook - Volume 2: Establishing an Integrated Performance Measurement System. Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) - U.S. Department of Energy, 2001.
11. Juran JM. Juran on Planning for Quality. The Free Press: NY, 1998.
12. International Standard ISO. Quality Management Systems - Fundamentals and Vocabulary, ISO 9000:2000, 2000.
13. International Standard ISO. Quality Management Systems - Requirements Specifics, ISO 9001:2000, 2000.
14. International Standard ISO. Quality Management Systems - Guidelines for Performance Improvements, ISO 9004:2000, 2000.
15. Lins MPE, Gomes EG, Scares de Mello JCCB, Soares de Mello AJR. Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model. European Journal of Operational Research 2003; 148(2):85-95.
16. Bouyssou D, Marchant T, Pirlot M, Perny P. Tsoukiàs A, Vincke P. Evaluation and Decision Models: A Critical Perspectives. Kluwer Academic: Boston, MA, 2000.
17. Dixon JR, Nanni AJ, Vollmann TE. The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World-Class Competition. Dow Jones-Irwin: Homewood, IL, 1990.
18. Maskell BH. Performance Measurement for World Class Manufacturing. Productivity Press: Cambridge, MA, 1991.
19. Brown MG. Keeping Score: Using the Right Metrics to Drive World-Class Performance. Quality Resources: New York, NY, 1996.
20. Kaydos W. Operational Performance Measurement: Increasing Total Productivity. St. Lucie Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1999.
21. Smith D. The Measurement Nightmare: How the Theory of Constraints Can Resolve Conflicting Strategies, Policies, and Measures. St. Lucie Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2000.
22. Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K. Performance measurement system design. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 1995; 4:80-116.
23. New CC, Szwejczewski M. Performance measurement and the focused factory: Empirical evidence. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 1995; 15(4):63-79.
24. Beaumon BM. Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 1999; 19(3):275-292.
25. Melnyk SA, Stewart DM, Swink M. Metrics and performance measurement in operation management: Dealing with the metrics maze. Journal of Operations Management 2004; 22:209-217.
26. Evans JR. An exploratory study of performance measurement systems and relationship with performance results. Journal of Operations Management 2004; 22:219-232.
27. Kaplan RS, Norton D. The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 1992; (January-February):71-79.
28. Kaplan RS, Norton D. The Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business School Press: Cambridge, MA, 1996.
29. Kaplan RS, Norton D. The Strategy-focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, 2001.
30. Lambert DM, Burduroglu R. Measuring and selling the value of logistics. International Journal of Logistics Research 2000;11(1):1-17.
31. Austin RB. Measuring and Managing Performance in Organizations. Dorset House: New York, NY, 1996.
32. Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper and Row: New York, 1978.
33. Galbraith JR. Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1973.
34. Franceschini F, Galetto M. An empirical investigation of learning curve composition laws for quality improvement in complex manufacturing plants. Journal of Manufacturing and Technology Management 2004; 15(7):687-699.
35. Roy B, Bouyssou D. Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas. Economica: Paris, 1993.
36. Roberts FS. Measurement Theory. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1979.
37. Finkelstein L. Widely, strongly and weakly defined measurement. Measurement 2003; 34(1):39-48.
38. Franceschini F, Galetto M, Varetto M. Ordered samples control charts for ordinal variables. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 2005; 21(2):177-195.
39. Banker RD, Chang H, Janakiraman SN, Konstants C. A balanced scorecard analysis of performance metrics. European Journal of Operations Research 2004; 154:423-436.
40. Franceschini F, Romano D. Control chart for linguistic variables: A method based on the use of linguistic quantifiers. International Journal of Production Research 1999; 37( 16):3791-3801.
41. Borda JC. Mémoire sur les élections au scrutin. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences 1781.
42. (Engl. transi. de Grazia A. Mathematical derivation of an election system. Isis 1781; 44:42-51.)
43. Condorcet MJANC (Marquis de). Essai sur l' application de l' analyse à la probabilité des décisions redues à la pluralitŕ des voix. Imprimerie Royale: Paris, 1785.
44. Fishburn PC. Utility Theory for Decision-making. Wiley: New York, 1970.