The success story of peritoneal dialysis in Romania: Analysis of differences in mortality by dialysis modality and influence of risk factors in a national cohort

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 266-275

  Mircescu, Gabriel ^a,c   Garneata, Liliana ^a   Florea, Laura ^b   Cepoi, Vasile ^b   Capsa, Dimitrie ^c   Covic, Maria ^b,c   Gherman Caprioara, Mirela ^c   Gluhovschi, Gheorghe ^c   Golea, Ovidiu Sorin ^c   Barbulescu, Carmen ^a   Rus, Elvira ^a   Santimbrean, Caterina ^a   Mardare, Nicoleta ^b   Covic, Adrian ^b,c  

^a CAROL DAVILA UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY   (Romania)

^b C I PARHON NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY   (Romania)

^c The Romanian Renal Registry   (Romania)

Author keywords

Death rate; Survival; Technique survival

Indexed keywords

ERYTHROPOIETIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMORBIDITY; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; KIDNEY FAILURE; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NEPHROSCLEROSIS; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; ROMANIA; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; ADOLESCENT; AGED; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; MIDDLE AGED; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; ROMANIA; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 33747123761     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089686080602600224     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Mircescu G, Capsa D, Covic M, Gherman Caprioara M, Gluhovschi G, Golea O, et al. Nephrologyand renal replacement therapy in Romania - transition still continues (Cinderella story revisited). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19:2971-80.
2. Covic AC, Goldsmith DJ, Florea L, Gusbeth P. Volovat C, Taranu T, et al. Should CAPD be the first choice for dialysis in Romania? Audit of the Iasi "C. I. Parhon" Dialysis Center: 1995-2000. Nephrol Dial Thansplant 2001; 16: 1996-2001.
3. Van Biesen W, Davies S, Lameire N. An integrated approach to end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Thansplant 2001; 16:7-9.
4. Ursea N, Mircescu G, Constantinovici N, Verzan C. Nephrology and renal replacement therapy in Romania. Nephrol Dial Thansplant 1997; 12:684-90.
5. Rutkowski B, Ciocalteu A, Djukanovic L, Kiss I, Kovac A, Krivoshiev S, et al. Evolution of renal replacement therapy in Central and Eastern Europe 7 years after political and economical liberation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13: 860-4.
6. Locatelli F, Pisoni RL, Combe C, Bommer J, Andreucci VE, Piera L, et al. Anaemia in haemodialysis patients of five European countries: association with morbidity and mortality in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19:121-32.
7. Mogyorosy Z, Mucsi I, Rosivall L. Renal replacement therapyin Hungary: the decade oftransition. Nephrol Dial Thansplant 2003; 18:1066-71.
8. Charytan C, Spinowitz BS, Galler M. A comparative study of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and center hemodialysis. Efficacy, complications, and outcome in the treatment of end-stage renal disease. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146:1138-43.
9. Maiorca R, Vonesh E, Cancarini GC, Cantaluppi A, Manili L, Brunori G, et al. A six-year comparison of patientand technique survivals in CAPD and HD. Kidney Int 1988; 34: 518-24.
10. Gokal R, Jakubowski C, King J, Hunt L, Bogle S, Baillod R, et al. Outcome in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis: 4-year analysis of a prospective multicentre study. Lancet 1987; 14:1105-9.
11. ERA/EDTA Annual Data Report, 2002. Available from: http://www.era-edta-reg.org
12. United States Renal Data System. USRDS 2003 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2003.
13. Ross S, Dong E, Gordon M, Connelly J, Kvasz M, Iyengar M, et al. Meta-analysis of outcome studies in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 2000; 57:28-38.
14. Rayner HC, Pisoni RL, Bommer J, Canaud B, Hecking E, Locatelli F, et al. Mortality and hospitalization in haemodialysis patients in five European countries: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19:108-20.
15. Heaf JG, Lokkegaard H, Madsen M. Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17:112-17.
16. Locatelli F, Marcelli D, Conte F, D'Amico M, Del Vecchio L, Limido A, et al. Survival and development of cardiovascular disease by modality oftreatmentin patients with endstage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12:2411-17.
17. Murphy SW, Foley RN, Barrett BJ, Kent GM, Morgan J, Barre P. et al. Comparative mortality of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in Canada. Kidney Int 2000; 57:1720-6.
18. Vonesh EF, Moran J. Mortality in end-stage renal disease: a reassessment of differences between patients treated with hemodialysis and penitoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10:354-65.
19. Schaubel DE, Morrison HI, Fenton SS. Comparing mortality rates on CAPD/ CCPD and hemodialysis. The Canadian experience: fact or fiction? Perit Dial Int 1998; 18:478-84.
20. Bloembergen WE, Port FK, Mauger EA, Wolfe RA. A comparison of mortality between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995; 6:177-83.
21. Ganesh SK, Hulbert-Shearon T, Port FK, Eagle K, Stack AG. Mortality differences by dialysis modality among incident ESRD patients with and without coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:415-24.
22. Stack AG, Molony DA, Rahman NS, Dosekun A, Murthy B. Impact of dialysis modality on survival of new ESRD patients with congestive heart fai lure in the United States. Kidney Int 2003; 64:1071-9.
23. Serkes KD, Blagg CR, Nolph KD, Vonesh EF, Shapiro F. Comparison of patient and technique survival in continuous ambulatory penitoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis: a multicenter study. Perit Dial Int 1990; 10:15-19.
24. Xue JL, Everson SE, Constantini EG, Ebben JP, Chen SC, Agodoa LY, et al. Peritoneal and hemodialysis. II. Mortality risk associated with initial patient characteristics. Kidney Int 2002; 61:741-6.
25. Vonesh EF, Snyder JJ, Foley RN, Collins AJ. The differential impact of risk factors on mortality in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2004; 66:2389-401.
26. Majorca R, Vonesh EF, Cavalli P. De Vecchj A, Giangrande A, La Greca G, et al. A multicenter, selection-adjusted comparison of patient and technique survivals on CAPD and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 1991; 11:118-27.
27. Khan IH, Catto GR, Edward N, Macleod AM. Death during the first 90 days of dialysis: a case control study. Am J Kidney Dis 1995; 25:276-80.
28. Winkelmayer WC, Owen WF Jr, Levin R, Avorn J. A propensity analysis of late versus early nephrologist referral and mortality on dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14:486-92.