Responsiveness of the coronary revascularisation outcome questionnaire compared with the SF-36 and Seattle Angina Questionnaire

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1069-1078

  Schroter, Sara ^a,b   Lamping, Donna L ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b British Medical Journal Technology Assessment Group   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Quality of life; Questionnaire; Responsiveness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION OUTCOME QUESTIONNAIRE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SEATTLE ANGINA QUESTIONNAIRE; SHORT FORM 36; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE;

EID: 33747111364     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-005-5993-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. MJ [tmp] McCarthy AL Shroyer GK Sethi 1995 Self-report measures for assessing treatment outcomes in cardiac surgery patients Med Care 33 Suppl 10 76 85
2. HM Krumholz CA [tmp] McHorney L Clark M Levesque DS Baim L Goldman 1996 Changes in health after elective percutaneous coronary revascularisation: A comparison of generic and specific measures Med Care 34 8 754 759
3. GM Lindsay P Hanlon LN Smith DJ Wheatley 2000 Assessment of changes in general health status using the short-form 36 questionnaire 1 year following coronary artery bypass grafting Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 18 557 564
4. TB Seto DA Taira R Berezin 2000 Percutaneous coronary revascularisation in elderly patients: Impact on functional status and quality of life Ann Intern Med 132 12 955 958
5. N Caine SC Harrison LD Sharples J Wallwork 1991 Prospective study of quality of life before and after coronary artery bypass grafting Br Med J 302 511 516
6. SJ Pocock RA Henderson P Seed T Treasure JR Hampton 1996 Quality of life, employment status, and anginal symptoms after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery: 3-year follow-up in the Randomized Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial Circulation 94 2 135 142
7. Wahrborg on behalf of the CABRI Trialists P. 1999 Quality of life after coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery Eur Heart J 20 653 658
8. E Engbolm H Hamalainen J Lind 1992 Quality of life during rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass surgery Qual Life Res 1 3 167 175
9. DS Fruitman CE [tmp] MacDougall DB Ross 1999 Cardiac surgery in octogenarians: Can elderly patients benefit? Quality of life after cardiac surgery Ann Thorac Surg 68 6 2129 2135
10. P [tmp] MacDonald K Stadnyk J Cossett G Klassen D Johnstone K Rockwood 1998 Outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in elderly people Can J Cardiol 14 10 1215 1222
11. JA Spertus JA Winder TA Dewhurst RA Deyo SD Fihn 1994 Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease Am J Cardiol 74 12 1240 1244
12. DL Patrick RA Deyo 1989 Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life Med Care 27 Suppl 3 217 232
13. JA Spertus JA Winder TA Dewhurst 1995 Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease J Am Coll Cardiol 25 2 333 341
14. S Schroter DL Lamping 2004 Coronary Revascularisation Outcome Questionnaire (CROQ): Development and validation of a new, patient based measure of outcome in coronary bypass surgery and angioplasty Heart 90 1460 1466
15. RD Hays R Anderson D Revicki 1993 Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures Qual Life Res 2 6 441 449
16. RA Deyo P Diehr DL Patrick 1991 Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: Statistics and strategies for evaluation Control Clin Trials 12 Suppl 4 142 158
17. J Cohen 1977 Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, Revised Ed. Academic Press New York
18. LE Kazis JJ Anderson RF Meenan 1989 Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status Med Care 27 Suppl 3 178 189
19. MH Liang AH Fossel MG Larson 1990 Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopaedic evaluation Med Care 28 7 632 642
20. GH Guyatt 1987 Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments J Chronic Dis 40 2 171 178
21. JA Husted RJ Cook VT Farewell DD Gladman 2000 Methods for assessing responsiveness: A critical review and recommendations J Clin Epidemiol 53 459 468
22. M Dempster M Donnelly 2000 Measuring the health related quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease Heart 83 641 644
23. JE Ware KK Snow M Kosinski B Gandek 1993 SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide The Health Institute, New England Medical Centre Boston
24. JE Ware MA Kosinski SD Keller 1994 SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Summary Measures: a User's Manual The Health Institute New England Medical Center Boston
25. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys 1991 Standard Occupational Classification. Vol 3. Social Classifications and Coding Methodology HMSO London
26. WS Weintraub PD Mauldin E Becker AS Kosinski SB King 1995 A comparison of the costs of and quality of life after coronary angioplasty or coronary surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: Results from the Emory Angioplasty Versus Surgery Trial (EAST) Circulation 92 10 2831 2840
27. RD Hays RT Anderson D Revicki 1998 Assessing reliability and validity of measurement in clinical trials MJ Staquet RD Hays PM Fayers Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: Methods and practice Oxford University Press New York 169 182
28. P Erickson 2000 Assessment of the evaluative properties of health status instruments Med Care 38 9 Suppl 2 95 99
29. JG Wright NL Young 1997 A comparison of different indices of responsiveness J Clin Epidemiol 50 3 239 246
30. PM Fayers D Machin 2000 Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation John Wiley & Sons Ltd Chichester