Socio-economic impact assessment of intelligent transport systems

Tsinghua Science and Technology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 339-350

  Juan, Zhicai ^a   Wu, Jianping ^b   McDonald, Mike ^b  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Convoy driving; Cost benefit analysis; Data envelopment analysis; Intelligent transport system; Socio economic impacts assessment

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION; INTELLIGENT CONTROL;

CONVOY DRIVING; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEM; SOCIO ECONOMIC IMPACTS ASSESSMENT;

TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 33747092364     PISSN: 10070214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1007-0214(06)70198-5     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Polk A E. What ITS has to offer municipal governments. In: 7th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Paper number 1051. Turin, Italy, 2006.
2. Clowes D J. National ITS including transportation information highways (TIH), National Control Centres and RTA. In: 7th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Paper number 5001. Turin, Italy, 2000.
3. Kikuchi H, Kawasaki S, Nakazato G. ITS in Japan: Current status and future directions. In: 7th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Paper number 3149. Turin, Italy, 2000.
4. Department of the Environment. Transport and the Regions of the UK. Guidance on the New Approach to Appraisal, University of Southampton, 1998.
5. Polk A E. The ITS benefits special studies effort at the US DOT. In: 7th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Paper number 1050. Turin, Italy, 2000.
6. McDonald M, Wu J, Juan Z. The socio-economic impacts assessment for motorway advanced transport telematics system: Final report to the engineering and physical sciences research council. Transportation Research Group, University of Southampton, 2001.
7. McDonald M, Wu J, Brackstone M. TACO (Technologies for Advanced Co-operative Driving) final report to the engineering and physical sciences research council. Transportation Research Group, University of Southampton, 1998.
8. Zhang X, Kopener P, Sexton B, Maltby D, Morello S. Guidebook for Assessment of Transport Telematics Applications, Deliverable DVQ5.1 Version 2.0, CONVERGE Project TR 1101, 1996.
9. Bristow L, Pearman A, Shires J. An assessment of advanced transport telematics evaluation procedures. Transport Reviews, 1997, 17(3): 177-205.
10. Ran B, Lee K Y K, Dong H. Cost-benefit analysis on deployment of automated highway systems. Transportation Research Record, 1997, 1588: 137-144.
11. Baum H, Geissler T. Assessing socio costs and socio benefits of AHS: Methodological and empirical approach for the introduction of CHAUFFEUR in Germany and Japan. In: 7th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Paper number 2224. Turin, Italy, 2000.
12. Baum H, Schulz W H, Geissler T. Efficiency analysis of automated highway systems implementation strategies for Japan. Cologne University, Germany, 1999.
13. Schnarr T J, Kitaska K. Evaluating ATMS from a business respective: Vancouver's traffic management program. In: Third World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems. Orlando, Florida, 1996: 249-250.
14. Shibata M. The economic effect of in-car navigation system. In: Proceedings of IEEE 3rd Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference. Oslo, Norway, 1992: 632-637.
15. Motyka V, James B. Concrete application of road information strategy. VMS in ILE-DE-FRANCE. Detailed quantitative evaluation and first glimpse of socio-economic benefits. In: Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Applications of Transport Telematics and Intelligent Vehicle-Highway Systems. Paris, 1994, 3: 1364-1371.
16. Tarry S, Graham A. The role of valuation in ATT development (Part 4): Evaluation of ATT systems. Traffic Engineering and Control, 1995, 36(12): 688-693.
17. Jeffery D. The potential benefits of route guidance. TRRL Laboratory Report LR 997. Crowthorne, Berkshire, 1981.
18. Harvey S. The political and economic implications of ATT: Towards an intelligent transport system. In: Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Applications of Transport Telematics and Intelligent Vehicle-Highway Systems, Paris, 1994, 6: 3125-3132.
19. Lee D B Jr. Benefit-cost evaluation of traveller information: Seattle's Washington State Department of Transportation website. Transportation Research Record, 2000, 1739: 25-34.
20. Charnes A, Cooper W W, Huang Z M, Sun D B. Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. Journal of Econometrics, 1978, 46(1/2): 73-91.
21. Walters L C, Thurgood G, Adolphson D L. New approach to integrating engineering, managerial, and political judgment: Development of the Utah project prioritisation system. Transportation Research Record, 1993, 1400: 1-9.
22. Minken H, Odeck J. Applying data envelopment analysis (DEA) to project selection: Transportation planning methods. In: Proceedings of Seminar D, PTRC European Transport Forum. Brunei University, England, 1996.
23. Kerstens K. Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit company. Transportation Research, Part A, 1996, 30A(6): 431-452.
24. Viton P A. Changes in multi-mode bus transit efficiency, 1988-1992. Transportation, 1998, 25(1): 1-21.
25. Parker D. The performance of BAA before and after privatisation: A DEA study. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 1999, 33(2): 133-146.
26. Juan Z, Wang J, Jing J. DEA and the effectiveness of technical scales of transport enterprises. Science and Technology of Highway and Transport, 1994, 11(4): 44-50. (in Chinese)
27. Taylor S T, Singleton B N. ITS: Communications technology case study. ITE Journal, 1996, 66(5): 28.
28. De Corla-Souza, Patric Culp M, Hunt J, Cohen H, Haling D. A new tool for benefit-cost analysis in evaluating transport alternatives. In: The Sixth TRB Conference on the Application of Transportation Planning Methods. Dearborn, Michigan, USA, 1997: 11.
29. Daetz D, Bebendorf M. A socio-economic impact assessment of the Los Angeles automatic vehicle monitoring (AVM) demonstration. Report by SYSTAN Incorporated, Urban Mass Transportation Administration, Washington, DC, 20590, USA, 1982: 108.
30. Sisson M. Air quality benefits of electronic toll collection. Transportation Quarterly, 1995, 49(4): 93-101.
31. IVHS America. Guidelines for an ATMS. Washington, DC, 20036-1993, USA, 1992: 100.
32. Smith R. London transports buses: ATT in action and the London countdown route 18 report. In: Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Applications of Transport Telematics and Intelligent Vehicle-Highway Systems. Paris, 1994, 6: 3048-3055.
33. Couch N R, Brackstone M, Wu J, McDonald M, Landsdown T. Technologies for advanced co-operative driving. Final Project Report to EPSRC/LINK, 1999.
34. Wu J, Brackstone M, McDonald M. Fuzzy sets and systems for a motorway microscopic simulation model. International Journal of Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 116(1): 65-76.
35. McDonald M, Mareden G, Brackstone M. Deployment of interurban ATT test scenarios (DIATS): Implications for the European road network. Transport Review, 2001, 21(3): 303-336.
36. Wu J, McDonald M, Brackstone M. Effect of convoy driving on motorway flow stability and capacity. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Road Transport Information and Control. IEEE. London, 2000: 91-95.
37. Wu J, McDonald M, Brackstone M. TACO project simulation results (Part two): The impacts of convoy operations on journey time. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southampton, 1999.
38. Wu J, McDonald M, Brackstone M. TACO project simulation results (Part three): The impacts of convoy operations on flow stability. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southampton, 1999.
39. Wu J, McDonald M, Brackstone M. TACO project simulation results (Part one): Motorway capacity with convoy operation. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Southampton, 1999.
40. Department of the Environment. Transport and the Regions of the UK. The COBA Manual, 1997.
41. Transport Research Laboratory. Review of the potential benefits of road transport telematics. TRL, Crowthorne, UK, 1996.