Individual autonomy in work teams: The role of team autonomy, self-efficacy, and social support

European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 281-299

  van Mierlo, H ^a,b   Rutte, C ^b   Vermunt, J ^c   Kompier, M ^d   Doorewaard, J ^d  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747084108     PISSN: 1359432X     EISSN: 14640643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13594320500412249     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aiken, L. and West, S.(1991) Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
2. Akaike, H. (1987) Factor analysis and AIC Psychometrika, 52, pp. 317-332.
3. Bandura, A.(1986) Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Bandura, A.(1997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5. Barker, J. (1993) Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, pp. 408-437.
6. Bentler, P. and Chou, C. (1987) Practical issues in structural modeling Sociological Methods and Research, 6, pp. 78-117.
7. Bliese, P.(2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Bollen, K.(1989) Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
9. Bryk, A. and Raudenbush, S.(1992) Hierarchical linear models. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
10. Buunk, B. and de Jonge, J. and Ybema, J. and de Wolff, C.(1998) Psychosocial aspects of occupational stress. In Handbook of work and organizational psychology. (pp. 145-182). Hove: Psychology Press.
11. Campion, M. and Medsker, G. and Higgs, A. (1993) Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups Personnel Psychology, 46, pp. 823-850.
12. Chan, D. (1998) Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, pp. 234-246.
13. Cole, M. and Schaninger, W. and Harris, S. (2002) The workplace social exchange network: A multilevel, conceptual examination Group and Organization Management, 27, pp. 142-167.
14. Cordery, J. and Mueller, W. and Smith, L. (1991) Attitudinal and behavioural effects of autonomous group working: A longitudinal field study Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp. 464-476.
15. Dunlap, W. and Burke, M. and Smith-Crowe, K. (2003) Accurate tests of statistical significance for rwg and average deviation interrater agreement indexes Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, pp. 356-362.
16. George, J. (1990) Personality, affect, and behavior in groups Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, pp. 107-116.
17. Gibson, C. (2001) Me and us: Differential relationships among goal-setting training, efficacy, and effectiveness at the individual and team level Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, pp. 789-808.
18. Goldstein, H. and Rasbash, J. and Plewis, I. and Draper, D. and Browne, W. and Yang, M. and et al. (1998) A user's guide to MLwiN. London: Multilevel Models Project, Institute of Education, University of London.
19. Goodman, P. and Devadas, R. and Hughson, T.(1988) Groups and productivity: Analyzing the effectiveness of self-managing teams. In Productivity in organisations. (pp. 295-325). San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.
20. Griffin, M. and Patterson, M. and West, M. (2001) Job satisfaction and teamwork: The role of supervisor support Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, pp. 537-550.
21. Guzzo, R. and Dickson, M. (1996) Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness Annual Review of Psychology, 47, pp. 307-338.
22. Hackman, J.(1987) The design of work teams. In Handbook of organizational behavior. (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
23. Hackman, J. and Oldham, G. (1975) Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, pp. 159-170.
24. Hackman, J. and Oldham, G.(1980) Work redesign. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
25. James, L. and Demaree, R. and Wolf, G. (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, pp. 85-98.
26. Jex, S. and Bliese, P. (1999) Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, pp. 349-361.
27. Jöreskog, K. and Sörbom, D.(1993) LISREL 8 user's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
28. Karasek, R., Jr. (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job design Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, pp. 285-308.
29. Karasek, R.(1998) Demand/Control Model: A social, emotional, and physiological approach to stress risk and active behavior development. In Encyclopedia of occupational health and safety. (pp. 34.6-34.14). Geneva: International Labour Office.
30. Kenny, D.(1998) Structural Equation Modeling: Multiple factor models. In. Retrieved July 20, 2005, from http://davidakenny.net/kenny.htm
31. Kirkman, B. and Rosen, B. (1999) Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment Academy of Management Journal, 42, pp. 58-74.
32. Klein, K. and Dansereau, F. and Hall, R. (1994) Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis Academy of Management Review, 19, pp. 195-229.
33. Klein, K. and Kozlowski, S.(2000) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
34. Kozlowski, S. and Bell, B.(2003) Work groups and teams in organizations. In Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology. (pp. 333-375). Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
35. Langfred, C. (2000) The paradox of self-management: Individual and group autonomy in work groups Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, pp. 563-585.
36. Langfred, C. (2004) Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams Academy of Management Journal, 47, pp. 385-399.
37. Lindsley, D. and Brass, D. and Thomas, J. (1995) Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective Academy of Management Review, 20, pp. 645-678.
38. Mueller, F. and Procter, S. and Buchanan, D. (2000) Teamworking in its context(s): Antecedents, nature and dimensions Human Relations, 53(11), pp. 1387-1424.
39. Parker, S. and Wall, T. and Cordery, J. (2001) Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, pp. 413-440.
40. Schwarzer, R.(1992) Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington DC: Hemisphere.
41. Seers, A. and Petty, M. and Cashman, J. (1995) Team-member exchange under team and traditional management: A natural occurring quasi-experiment Group and Organization Management, 20, pp. 18-38.
42. Semmer, N. and Grebner, S. and Elfering, A.(2004) Beyond self-report: Using observational, physiological, and situation-based measures in research on occupational stress. In Research in occupational stress and well-being: Vol. 3. Emotional and physiological processes and positive intervention strategies. (pp. 205-263). Amsterdam/Boston: Elsevier Science.
43. Settoon, R. and Bennett, N. and Liden, R. (1996) Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, pp. 219-227.
44. Snijders, T. and Bosker, R.(1999) Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London: Sage Publications.
45. Sundstrom, E. and de Meuse, K. and Futrell, D. (1990) Work teams: Applications and effectiveness The American Psychologist, 45, pp. 120-133.
46. Taris, T. and Kompier, M. (2003) Challenges in longitudinal designs in occupational health psychology Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 29, pp. 1-4.
47. Van Mierlo, H. and Rutte, C. and Kompier, M. and Doorewaard, J. (2005) Self-managing teamwork and psychological well-being: Review of a multilevel research domain Group and Organization Management, 30, pp. 211-235.
48. Van Mierlo, H. and Rutte, C. and Kompier, M. and Seinen, B. (2001) Autonomous teamwork and psychological well-being European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, pp. 291-301.
49. Van Veldhoven, M. and de Jonge, J. and Broersen, S. and Kompier, M. and Meijman, T. (2002) Specific relationships between psychosocial job conditions and job-related stress: A three-level analytic approach Work and Stress, 16, pp. 207-228.
50. Warr, P. (1994) A conceptual framework for the study of work and mental health Work and Stress, 8, pp. 84-97.
51. Wright, B. and Barker, J. (2000) Assessing concertive control in the term environment Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, pp. 345-361.