Molecular characterization of Solanum habrochaites accessions

Journal of Genetics and Breeding

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 15-20

  Ercolano, M R ^a   Sebastiano, A ^a   Monti, L ^a   Frusciante, L ^a   Barone, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Genetic variability; Germplasm management; Molecular markers; S. habrochaites; Tomato

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON HIRSUTUM; SOLANUM;

EID: 33747080205     PISSN: 03949257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ALVAREZ A.E., VAN DE WIEL C.C.M. and SMULDERS M.J.M., VOSMAN B., 2001. Use of microsatellites to evaluate genetic diversity and species relationships in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor. Appl. Genet., 103: 1283-1292.
2. BAUNDRY E., KERDELHUÉ C., INNAN H. and STEPHAN W., 2001. Species and recombination effects on DNA variability in the tomato genus. Genetics, 158: 1725-1735.
3. BEEBE S., SKROCH P.W., TOHME J., DUQUE M.C., PEDRAZA F. and NIENHUIS J., 2000. Structure of genetic diversity among common bean landraces of Middle American origin based on correspondence analysis of RAPD. Crop Science, 40: 264-273.
4. BERNACCHI D,. BECK-BUNN T., ESHED Y., LOPEZ J., PETIARD V., UHLIG J., ZAMIR D., and TANKSLEY S., 1998. Advanced backcross QTL analysis in tomato. I. Identification of QTLs for traits of agronomic importance from Lycopersicon habrochaites. Theor. Appl. Genet., 97: 861-877
5. BORNET B., GORAGUER E, JOLY G. and BRACHARD M., 2002. Genetic diversity in European and Argentinean cultivated potatoes (Solanum tuberosum subsp. tuberosum) detected by inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSRs). Genome, 45: 481-484.
6. COULIBALY S., PASQUET R.S., PAPA R. and GEPTS P., 2002. AFLP analysis of the phenetic organization and genetic diversity of Vigna unguiculata L. Walp. reveals extensive gene flow between wild and domesticated types. Theor. Appl. Genet., 104: 358-366.
7. DELLAPORTA S.L., WOOD J. and HICKS, J.B., 1983. A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II. Plant. Mol. Biol. Rep., 1: 19-21.
8. DICE L.R., 1945. Measures of the amount of ecological association between species. Ecology, 26: 297-302
9. EGASHIRA H., ISHIHARA H., TAKASHINA T. and IMANISHI S., 2000. Genetic diversity of the 'peruvianum-complex' (Lycopersicon peruvianum (L.) Mill, and L. chilense Dun.) revealed by RAPD analysis. Euphytica, 116: 23-31.
10. FOOLAD M.R. and LIN G.Y., 1999. Relationship between cold tolerance during seed germination in tomato: germplasm evaluation. Plant Breeding, 118: 45-48.
11. HARMICK J.L. and HOLDEN L.R., 1979. Influence of microhabitat heterogeneity on gene frequency distribution and gametic phase disequilibrium in Avenu barbata. Evolution, 33: 521-533.
12. HARMICK J.L. and GODS M.J.W., 1990. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown D., Clegg M.Y., Kahler A.L. and Weir B.S., (9 eds.), Plant population genetics: breeding and genetic resources, Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts, Usa pp. 3-43.
13. HASSAN A.A., WAFI M.S., QURONFIHALH N.B., OBAJI U.A., AL RAYIS M.A. and AL-IZABI F., 1991. Evaluation of wild and domestic Lycopersicon accessions for tomato yellow leaf curl virus resistance. Egyptian Journal of Horticulture, 18: 23-43.
14. KABELKA E., FRANCHINO B. and FRANCIS D.M., 2002. Two loci from Lycopersicon habrochaites LA 407 confer resistance to strains of Clavibacter michiganensis. Phytopathology, 92: 504-510.
15. LATERROT H. and MORETTI A., 1993. Rapport d'Activités 1991-1992. Station d'Amélioration des Plants Maraichères, Avignon-Montfavet pp. 68-73.
16. st International symposium tropical tomato diseases, 21-22 novembre - Recife - Brasil.
17. LEGNANI R., GOGNALONS P., SELASSIE K.G., MARCHOUX G., MORETTI A. and LATERROT H., 1996. Identification and characterization of resistance to tobacco etch virus in Lycopersicon species. Plant Disease, 80: 306-309.
18. MARSHALL J.A., KNAPP S., DAVEY M.R., POWER J.B., COCKING E.C., BENNETT M.D. and COX A.V., 2001. Molecular systematic of Solanum section Lycopersicum (Lycopersicon) using the nuclear ITS rDNA region. Theor. Appl. Genet., 103: 1216-1222.
19. MILLER J.C. and TANKSLEY S.D., 1990. RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theor. Appl. Genet., 80: 437-448.
20. MONFORTE A.J. and TANKSLEY S.D., 2000. Fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus (QTL) from Lycopersicon habrochaites chromosome 1 affecting fruit characteristics and agronomic traits: breaking linkage among QTLs affecting different traits and dissection of heterosis for yield. Theor. Appl. Genet., 100: 471-479
21. MULLER C.H., 1940. A revision of genus Lycopersicon. USDA Miscellaneous Publication, 382: 21.
22. MUSETTI L. and NEAL J.J., 1997. Resistance to the pink potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae, in two accessions of Lycopersicon habrochaites f. glabratum. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 84: 137-146.
23. NOLI E., CONTI S., MACCAFERRI M. and SANGUINETI M.C., 1999. Molecular characterization of tomato cultivars. Seed Science and Technology, 27: 1-10.
24. PARRELLA G., LATERROT H., MARCHOUX G. and GEBRE-SELASSIE K., 1997. Screening Lycopersicon accessions for resistance to alfalfa mosaic virus. Journal of Genetics and Breeding, 51: 75-78.
25. PERALTA I.E., and SPOONER D.M. 2001. Granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene phylogeny of wild tomatoes (Solanum L. section Lycopersicon [Mill.] Wettst. Subsection Lycopersicon). American Journal of Botany, 88 (10): 1888-1902.
26. RICK C.M., 1976. Tomato: In Simmonds NW (eds.), Evolution of crop plants. Longman, London pp. 262-273.
27. RICK C.M., FOBES J.F. and TANKSLEY S.D., 1979. Evolution of mating systems in Lycopersicon habrochaites as deduced from genetic variation in electrophoretic and morphological characters. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 132: 279-298
28. ROHLF M., 1998. NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.10p Department of Ecology and Evolution. State University of New York, Albany, N.Y.
29. SACKS E.J. and ST. CLAIR D.A., 1998. Variation among seven genotypes of Lycopersicon esculentum and 36 accessions of L. habrochaites for interspecific crossability. Euphytica, 101: 185-191.
30. SALIBA-COLOMBANI V., CAUSSE M., GERVAIS L. and PHILOUZE J., 2000. Efficiency of RFLP, RAPD, and AFLP markers for the construction of an intraspecific map of the tomato genome. Genome, 43: 29-40.
31. SOTIROVA V, STOIMENOVA E. and RODEVA R., 1992. Sources of complex disease resistance in wild species of genus Lycopersicon. Genetika Selektsiya, 25: 38-44.
32. STEVENS M.A. and RICK C.M., 1986. Genetics and Breeding In: Atherthon J.G. and Rudich, J (eds.), The tomato crop: a scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall London, New York., Usa pp. 35-96.
33. TAYLOR I.B. 1986. Biosystematic of tomato In: Atherthon J.G. and Rudich, J (eds.), The tomato crop: a scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall London, New York., Usa pp. 1-30.
34. VILLAND J., SKROCH PW., LAI T., HANSON P., KUO C.G. and NIENHUIS J., 1998. Genetic variation among tomato accessions from primary and secondary centers of diversity. Crop Science, 38: 1339-1347.
35. WARNOCK S.J., 1988. A review of taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Lycopersicon. HortScience, 23: 669-673.
36. WILLIAMS C.E. and ST. CLAIR D.A., 1993. Phenetic relationships and levels of variability detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of cultivated and wild accessions of Lycopersicon esculentum. Genome, 36: 619-630.
37. WOLFGANG S. and LANGLEY C.H. 1998. DNA polymorphism in Lycopersicon and crossing-over per physical length. Genetics, 150: 1585-1593.