Commentary on Nystedt A, Högberg U & Lundman B (2005) The negative birth experience of prolonged labour: A case-referent study. Journal of Clinical Nursing 14, 579-586

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1206-1207

  Mander, Rosemary ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DEFENSE MECHANISM; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TIME;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; NEGATIVISM; PREGNANCY; RESEARCH DESIGN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33747072002     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: 13652702     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01338.x     Document Type: Note

References (4)

1. Cheyne H, Dunlop A, Shields N & Mathers AM (2003) A randomised controlled trial of admission electronic fetal monitoring in normal labour. Midwifery 19, 221-229.
2. Howell CJ (1999) Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 1 Copyright © 2005, The Cochrane Collaboration, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, NY.
3. Nystedt A, Högberg U & Lundman B (2005) The negative birth experience of prolonged labour: a case-referent study. Journal of Clinical Nursing 14, 579-586.
4. Thomson AM, Hillier VF (1994) A re-evaluation of the effect of pethidine on the length of labour. Journal of Advanced Nursing 19, 448-456.