메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 101-102

The EBM journal selection process: How to find the 1 in 400 valid and highly relevant new research articles

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT REPORT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; READING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 33747069393     PISSN: 13565524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/ebm.11.4.101     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (4)

References (1)
  • 1
    • 13844272128 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What do evidence-based secondary journals tell us about the publication of clinically important articles in primary healthcare journals?
    • doi:10.1186/1741-7015-2-33
    • McKibbon KA, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB. What do evidence-based secondary journals tell us about the publication of clinically important articles in primary healthcare journals? BMC Medicine 2004;2:33, doi:10.1186/ 1741-7015-2-33.
    • (2004) BMC Medicine , vol.2 , pp. 33
    • McKibbon, K.A.1    Wilczynski, N.L.2    Haynes, R.B.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.