A gravimetric geoid model as a vertical datum in Canada

Geomatica

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 165-172

  Véronneau, Marc ^a   Duval, Robert ^a   Huang, Jianliang ^a  

^a GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICS; GRAVIMETERS; GRAVITATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SURVEYING;

GEODYNAMICS; GRAVIMETRIC GEOID MODEL; VERTICAL DATUM; VERTICAL REFERENCE SYSTEM;

GEODESY;

DATA; GEOID; GRAVIMETRY; MODEL;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 33747068751     PISSN: 11951036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Burkholder E.F. 2002. Elevation and the global spatial data model (GSDM). Institute of Navigation 58th annual meeting, June 24-26, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
2. Burša M., E. Groten, S. Kenyon, J. Kouba, K. Radj, V. Vatrt, and M. Vojtišková. 2002. Earth's dimension specified by geopotential. Studia geophysica et geodaetica, 46, 1-8.
3. Burša M., S. Kenyon, J. Kouba, Z. Šima, V. Vatrt, M. Vojtišková. 2004. A Global vertical reference frame based on four regional vertical datums. Studia geophysica et geodaetica, 48, 493-502.
4. Cannon J.B. 1929. Adjustments of the precise level net of Canada 1928. Publication No. 28, Geodetic Survey Division, Earth Sciences Sector, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
5. Gareau R. 1986. History of precise levelling in Canada and the North American vertical datum readjustment. Graduate thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
6. Hannah J. 2001. An assessment of New Zealand's height systems and options for the future height datum. Report for the Surveyor General, Land Information New Zealand, PO Box 5501, Wellington.
7. Heiskanen W.A. and H. Moritz. 1967. Physical Geodesy, Freeman.
8. Huang J., M. Véronneau. 2006. In preparation.
9. LeGrand P., E.J.O. Schrama and J. Tournadre. 2003. An inverse estimate of the dynamic topography of the ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(2), 1062, doi:10.1029/2002GL014917.
10. Mäkinen J. 2004. Some remarks and proposals on the redefinition of the EVRS and EVRF. Presented at the meeting of the IAG Subcommission for the European Reference Frame (EUREF), Bratislava, June 1, 2004.
11. Reigber, Ch., G. Balmino, P. Schwintzer, R. Biancale, A. Bode, J.-M. Lemoine, R. Koenig, S. Loyer, H. Neumayer, J.-C. Marty, F. Barthelmes, F. Perosanz and S.Y. Zhu. 2002. A high quality global gravity field model from CHAMP GPS tracking data and accelerometry (EIGEN-1S) Geophysical Research Letters, 29(14), 10.1029/2002GL015064.
12. Reigber Ch., R. Schmidt, F. Flechtner, R. König, U. Meyer, K.-H. Neumayer, P. Schwintzer, S.Y. Zhu. 2005. An Earth gravity field model complete to degree and order 150 from GRACE: EIGEN-GRACE02S, Journal of Geodynamics 39(1), pp. 1-10.
13. Tapley B.D., S. Bettadpur, M. Watkins and C. Reigber. 2004. The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results. Geophys. Res. Lett., Vol. 31, L09607, doi:10.1029/2004GL019920.
14. Véronneau M., A. Mainville and M.R. Craymer. 2002. The GPS height transformation (v2.0): An ellipsoidal-CGVD28 height transformation for use with GPS in Canada. Report, Geodetic Survey Division, Earth Sciences Sector, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
15. Véronneau M. 2002. The Canadian gravimetric geoid model of 2000 (CGG2000). Report, Geodetic Survey Division, Earth Sciences Sector, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
16. Zilkoski D.B. 1986. The new adjustment of the North American datum. ACSM Bulletin, April, pp. 35-36.
17. Zilkoski D.B., J.H. Richards and G.M. Young. 1992. Results of the general adjustment of the North American vertical datum of 1988. American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, Surveying and Land Information Systems, 52(3), pp. 133-149.