Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 93, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 929-936

  McKay, A ^a   Mackenzie, S ^a   Sutherland, F R ^a   Bathe, O F ^a   Doig, C ^a   Dort, J ^a   Vollmer Jr , C M ^b   Dixon, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DATA EXTRACTION; GASTROSTOMY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREAS FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

AMPULLA OF VATER; COHORT STUDIES; COMMON BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; GASTROSTOMY; HUMANS; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC FISTULA; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 33747061026     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5407     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Sosa JA, Bowman HM, Gordon TA, Bass EB, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD et al. Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 1998; 228: 429-438.
2. Wade TP, Halaby IA, Stapleton DR, Virgo KS, Johnson FE. Population-based analysis of treatment of pancreatic cancer and Whipple resection: Department of Defense hospitals, 1989-1994. Surgery 1996; 120: 680-685.
3. Aranha GV, Hodul P, Golts E, Oh D, Pickleman J, Creech S. A comparison of pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7: 672-682.
4. Bartoli FG, Arnone GB, Ravera G, Bachi V. Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature. Anticancer Res 1991; 11: 1831-1848.
5. Kim SW, Youk EG, Park YH. Comparison of pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy performed by one surgeon. World J Surg 1997; 21: 640-643.
6. Mason GR, Freeark RJ. Current experience with pancreatogastrostomy. Am J Surg 1995; 169: 217-219.
7. Miyagawa S, Makuuchi M, Lygidakis NJ, Noguchi T, Nishimaki K, Hashikura Y et al. A retrospective comparative study of reconstructive methods following pancreaticoduodenectomy - pancreaticojejunostomy vs. pancreaticogastrostomy. Hepatogastroenterology 1992; 39: 381-384.
8. Oussoultzoglou E, Bachellier P, Bigourdan JM, Weber JC, Nakano H, Jaeck D. Pancreaticogastrostomy decreased relaparotomy caused by pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy compared with pancreaticojejunostomy. Arch Surg 2004; 139: 327-335.
9. Pikarsky AJ, Muggia-Sullam M, Eid A, Lyass S, Bloom AI, Durst AT, et al. Pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy. A retrospective study of 28 patients. Arch Surg 1997; 132: 296-299.
10. Schlitt HJ, Schmidt U, Simunec D, Jager M, Aselmann H, Neipp M et al. Morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy following partial pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1245-1251.
11. Takano S, Ito Y, Watanabe Y, Yokoyama T, Kubota N, Iwai S. Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy in reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 423-427.
12. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 580-588.
13. Arnaud JP, Tuech JJ, Cervi C, Bergamaschi R. Pancreaticogastrostomy compared with pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Eur J Surg 1999; 165: 357-362.
14. Biehl T, Traverso LW. Is stenting necessary for a successful pancreatic anastomosis? Am J Surg 1992; 163: 530-532.
15. do Amaral CM, Tiziani V, Cintra ML, Amstalden I, Palhares FB. Local reaction and migration of injected silicone gel: experimental study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1993; 17: 335-338.
16. Nghiem DD, Pitzen RH, Corry RJ. Evaluation of techniques of controlling exocrine drainage after segmental pancreatectomy in dogs. Implications for pancreatic transplantation. Arch Surg 1985; 120: 1132-1137.
17. Poon RT, Lo SH, Fong D, Fan ST, Wong J. Prevention of pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 2002; 183: 42-52.
18. Adloff M, Schloegel M, Ollier JC, Cuvelier G. Pancreatojejunostomy or pancreatogastrostomy after cephalic pancreatoduodenectomy. Chirurgie 1992; 118: 63-70.
19. Andivot T, Cardoso J, Dousset B, Soubrane O, Bonnichon P, Chapuis Y. Complications of two types of pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Chir 1996; 50: 431-437.
20. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. The QUOROM Group. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 1448-1454.
21. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1-12.
22. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188.
23. Laird NM, Mosteller F. Some statistical methods for combining experimental results. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1990; 6: 5-30.
24. Normand SL. Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting. Stat Med 1999; 18: 321-359.