Women's perceptions on intimate partner violence in Mexico;Perspectivas de las mujeres maltratadas sobre la violencia de pareja en México

Salud Publica de Mexico

Volumn 48, Issue SUPPL. 2, 2006, Pages

  Agoff, Carolina ^a   Rajsbaum, Ari ^b   Herrera, Cristina ^c  

^a INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS FÍSICAS   (Mexico)

^b Instituto Latinoamericano de Estudios de la Familia   (Mexico)

^c INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SALUD PÚBLICA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Battered women; Mexico; Prejudice; Social environmental; Social values

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BATTERED WOMAN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEXICO; PARTNER VIOLENCE; PERCEPTION; SEX ROLE; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; BATTERED WOMEN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MEXICO; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PERCEPTION; SPOUSE ABUSE;

EID: 33747057421     PISSN: 00363634     EISSN: 16067916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. INSP/Secretaría de Salud. Encuesta Nacional sobre Violencia contra las Mujeres. ENVIM. Cuernavaca: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, 2003.
2. OPS/OMS. Informe mundial sobre la violencia y la salud. Pub. Científica y Técnica n° 588. Washington DC: OPS/OMS, 2003.
3. Heise L, Pitanguy J, Germain A. Violencia contra la mujer: la carga oculta sobre la salud. Washington D.C.: OPS, 1994.
4. Mannheim K. Strukturen des Denkens. [Estructuras del pensamiento]. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1980.
5. Bourdieu P. La dominación masculina. Barcelona: Anagrama, 2000.
6. Hoff L A. Violence issues: an interdisciplinary curriculum guide for health professionals. Ottawa: Health Canada, 1994.
7. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.
8. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage, 1990.
9. Go V, Johnson S, Bentley M, Sivaram S, Srikrishnan A, Celentano D, et al. Crossing the threshold: engendered definitions of socially acceptable domestic violence in Chennai, India. Cult Health Sex 2003; 5: 393-408.
10. Eisikovits Z, Winstok Z, Fishman G. The first Israeli National Survey on Domestic Violence. Violence Against Women 200410:729-748.
11. Güezmes A, Palomino N, Ramos M. Violencia sexual y física contra las mujeres en el Perú. Estudio multicéntrico de la OMS sobre la violencia de pareja y la salud de las mujeres. Lima: OMS /Centro de la Mujer Peruana Flora Tristán /Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, 2002.
12. Heise L. Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women 1998; 4: 262-291.
13. Stets J, Straus MA. The marriage license as a hitting license: A comparison of assaults in dating, cohabiting and married couples. En: Straus MA, Gelles RJ, comp. Physical violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick: Transaction, 1990.
14. Yllo K, Straus MA. Interpersonal violence among married and cohabiting couples. Fam Relat 1981; 30: 339-347.
15. American Medical Association. Diagnostic and treatment guidelines on domestic violence. Chicago: American Medical Association, 1994.
16. Hucpey JE. Social support: Assesing conceptual coherente. Qual Health Res1998; 8: 304-318.
17. Bourdieu P. Le capital social: notes provisoires. Actes Rech Sci Soc 1980; 30:36.
18. Portes A. Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Ann Rev Sociol 1998; 24: 1-24.
19. Rose LE, Campbell J. The role of social support and family relationships in women's responses to battering. Health Care Women Int 2000; 21: 27-40.
20. De Barbieri T. Sobre la categoría género: una introducción teóricometodológica. Isis Internacional 1992; 17: 111-128.