Karyotyping of Brassica napus L. based on C0t-1 DNA banding by fluorescence in situ hybridization

Journal of Integrative Plant Biology

Volumn 47, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1479-1484

  Wei, Wen Hui ^a   Zhao, Wan Peng ^b   Wang, Li Jun ^a   Chen, Bo ^a   Li, Yun Chang ^a   Song, Yun Chun ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^b XINYANG NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Brassica napus; C0t 1 DNA; Chromosome banding; Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); Karyotyping

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; DNA FINGERPRINTING; FLUORESCENCE; HYBRIDIZATION; MORPHOLOGY; PLANT;

BRASSICA NAPUS;

EID: 33747052578     PISSN: 16729072     EISSN: 17447909     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2005.00186.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ayele, M, Haas, BJ, Kumar, N et al. (2005). Whole genome shotgun sequencing of Brassica oleracea and its application to gene discovery and annotation in Arabidopsis. Genome Res 15, 487-495.
2. Cheng BF, Heneen WK, Chen BY (1995). Mitotic karyotypes of Brassica campestris and Brassica alboglabra and identification of the B. alboglabra chromosome in an addition line. Genome 38, 313-319.
3. Doyle JJ, Doyle JI (1988). Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12, 13-15.
4. Dugan, LC, Pattee, MS, Williams, et al. (2005). Polymerase chain reaction-based suppression of repetitive sequences in whole chromosome painting probes for FISH. Chromosome Res 13, 27-32.
5. Flavell, RB, Bennett, MD, Smith, JB, et al. (1974). Genome size and the proportion of repeated sequence DNA in plants. Biochem Genet 12, 257-269.
6. Hasterok R, Maluszynska J (2000). Cytogenetic markers of Brassica napus chromosomes. J Appl Genet 41, 1-9.
7. Hasterok, R, Jenkins, G, Langdon, T, et al. (2001). Ribosomal DNA is an effective marker of Brassica chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet 103, 486-490.
8. Kahlem, P, Sultan, M, Herwig, R, et al. (2004). Transcript level alterations reflect gene dosage effects across multiple tissues in a mouse model of down syndrome. Genome Res 14, 1258-1267.
9. Kulak S, Hasterok R, Maluszynska J (2002). Karyotyping of Brassica amphidiploids using 5S and 25S rDNA as chromosome markers. Hereditas 136, 144-150.
10. McCouch SR, Tanskley SD (1991). The world rice economy: Challenges ahead. In: Khush, GS, Toenniessen, GH, eds. Rice Biotechnology: Biotechnology in Agriculture No. 6. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux International, Wallingford, UK.
11. Olin-Fatih M, Heneen WK (1992). C-banded karyotypes of Brassica campestris, B. oleracea, and B. napus. Genome 35, 583-589.
12. Snowdon, RJ, Kohler, W, Friedt, W, et al. (1997). Genomic in situ hybridization in Brassica amphidiploids and interspecific hybrids. Theor Appl Genet 95, 1320-1324.
13. Snowdon, RJ, Friedt, W, Köhler, A et al. (2000). Molecular cytogenetic location and characterization of 5S and 25S rDNA loci for chromosome identification in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Ann Bot 86, 201-204.
14. U N (1935). Genome-analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. JPN J Bot, 7, 389-453.
15. Wei, WH, Qin, R, Song, YC, et al. (2001). Comparative analyses to diseases resistant and nonresistant lines from maize × Zea diploperennis by GISH. Bot Bull Acad Sin 42, 109-114.
16. Wei, WH, Qin, R, Song, YC, et al. (2002). Location and analysis of introgressed segments in the parthenogenetic progenies of Zea mays × Z. diploperennis by GISH. Acta Bot Sin 44, 373-376.
17. Wei, WH, Zhao, WP, Song, et al. (2003). Genomic in situ hybridization analysis for identification of introgressed segments in alloplasmic lines from Zea mays × Zea diploperennis. Hereditas 138, 21-26.
18. Wang CJ, Chen CC (2005). Cytogenetic mapping in maize. Cytogenet Genome Res 109, 63-69.
19. 0t-1 banding of human chromosomes using fluorescence in situ hybridization with Cy3 labeling. JPN J Hum Genet 40, 243-252.
20. Yang, TJ, Kim, JS, Lim, KB, et al. (2005). The Korea Brassica genome project: A glimpse of the Brassica genome based on comparative genome analysis with Arabidopsis. Comp Funct Genom 6, 138-146.
21. 0t-1 DNA from plants. Genome 40, 138-142.