Measuring reading comprehension

Scientific Studies of Reading

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 323-330

  Fletcher, Jack M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747038087     PISSN: 10888438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_7     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Brown, J. L., Fischo, V. V., & Hanna, G. S. (1993). Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Chicago: Riverside.
2. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. A. (1979). Quasi-experimental design: Design and analysis issues. Chicago: Rand McNally.
3. Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277-299.
4. Deane, P., Sheehan, K. M., Sabatini, J., Futagi, Y., & Kostin, I. (2006). Differences in text structure and its implications for assessment of struggling readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 257-275.
5. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Davidson, K. C., Harm, M. W., & Griffin, J. (2004). Variability in text features in six grade 1 basal reading programs. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 167-197.
6. Francis, D. J., Snow, C. E., August, D., Carlson, C. D., Miller, J., & Iglesias, A. (2006). Measures of reading comprehension: A latent variable analysis of the diagnostic assessment of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 301-322.
7. Hiebert, E. H. (2002). Standards, assessments, and text difficulty. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 337-391). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
8. Millis, K., Magliano, J., & Todaro, S. (2006). Measuring discourse-level processes with verbal protocols and latent semantic analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 225-240.
9. Pearson, P. D., & Hamm, D. N. (2005). The assessment of reading comprehension: A review of practices - Past, present, and future. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 13-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding. Washington, DC: RAND Education.
11. Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J. (2006). Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 241-255.
12. Wechsler, D. L. (1992). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
13. Wiederholt, L., & Bryant, B. (1992). Gray Oral Reading Test-3. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
14. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.