Treatment non-negotiables: Why we need them and how to make them work

European Eating Disorders Review

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 212-217

  Geller, Josie ^a   Srikameswaran, Suja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Collaborative stance; Mandatory treatment components; Non negotiables

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINGE EATING DISORDER; DIET THERAPY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EATING DISORDER; EXPERIENCE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SAFETY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RESPONSIBILITY; THERAPY RESISTANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRUST; WEIGHT GAIN; WEIGHT REDUCTION;

EID: 33747031971     PISSN: 10724133     EISSN: 10990968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/erv.716     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Geller, J. (2002). What a motivational approach is and what a motivational approach isn't: Reflections and responses. European Eating Disorders Review, 10, 155-160.
2. Geller, J., Brown, K., Zaitsoff, S., Goodrich, S., & Hastings, F. (2003). Collaborative versus Directive Interventions in the Treatment of Eating Disorders: Implications for Care Providers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 406-413.
3. Geller, J., Cockell, S. J., & Drab, D. L. (2001). Assessing readiness for change in the eating disorders: The psychometric properties of the Readiness and Motivation Interview. Psychological Assessment, 13(2), 189-198.
4. Geller, J., Williams, K., & Srikameswaran, S. (2001). Clinician stance in the treatment of chronic eating disorders. European Eating Disorders Review, 9, 1-9.